Bicycle Frameset Assembly Using Friction Stir Welded Tube Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The adoption of friction stir welding (FSW) in consumer products is limited due to the need for significant redesign to accommodate the external, non-consumable tool, which is costly and impractical for many existing products, including bicycle frames and forks, where conventional fusion welding methods dominate.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a novel method and design for assembling bicycle frames and forks using friction stir welding, where tubular components are joined with partial tubular components and structural connector components using a friction stir welding tool, allowing for the construction of high-quality, high-mechanical-property joints without the need for consumables or extensive redesign.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If friction stir welding is adopted for bicycle frames and forks, then manufacturing quality and mechanical properties are improved, but device complexity and redesign costs increase due to the external non-consumable tool requirement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld joint qualityVSAvoidtooling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the FSW tool directly into the bicycle frame structure by nesting the tool housing within the frame tubes. The frame tubes serve dual purposes as both structural components and as the housing for the FSW tool, eliminating the need for external tooling and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The bicycle frame tubes are designed to perform multiple functions: they serve as structural load-bearing elements and simultaneously house the FSW tool components. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate external tooling systems, thereby reducing device complexity while enabling high-quality FSW joints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Stability of the object's composition

If friction stir welding is implemented, then residual stresses and distortion are reduced, but the manufacturing process complexity increases due to tool integration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual stressVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the FSW tool housing with the bicycle frame tubes, combining two separate systems (welding tool and frame structure) into a single integrated component. This reduces overall process complexity while maintaining the benefits of reduced residual stress and distortion through solid-state welding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional fusion welding is used, then ease of manufacture is maintained, but harmful factors such as porosity, splatter, and residual stresses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing easeVSAvoidweld defects
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the thermal-melting mechanism of fusion welding with the mechanical-solid state mechanism of friction stir welding. This substitution eliminates harmful factors such as porosity, splatter, and gas fumes associated with molten metal, while the integrated tool design maintains manufacturing ease through direct incorporation into the frame structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the use of solid-state welding processes for bicycle frames and forks, resulting in reduced residual stresses, distortion, porosity, and splatter, while providing superior mechanical properties and cost benefits, making high-quality bicycle frames and forks feasible with minimal redesign efforts.

Implementation Method 1

one component is rotated in relative motion with respect to the other component and comes into contact with the other component to generate sufficient frictional heating to cause plasticization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrictional heating: Friction

Implementation Method 2

Once plasticization occurs, portions of the material are upset from the applied force and a resulting metallurgical bond is formed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11897570B2Bicycle frame, fork, and frameset and method for constructing the same
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 ELLER MICHAEL
  • US11897570B2 patent drawing
  • US11897570B2 patent drawing
  • US11897570B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A novel bicycle frameset created from a novel frame assembly and a novel fork assembly, where the components of the frame are joined together via the friction stir welding of the tubular components to partial bracket members and where the joining of the partial bracket members via friction stir welding rigidly connects the tubular components to create the frame, and where the components of the fork are joined together via friction stir welding of tubular components to a fork crown, and where the fork and frame combine form the frameset.