Bicycle Hub Sprocket Support Composite Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bicycle hub assemblies face challenges in optimizing the design of the sprocket supporting member, particularly in materials selection and structural configuration, which affects the integration and durability of the sprocket with the hub axle.

Innovation Solution

The bicycle hub assembly incorporates a sprocket supporting member with a tubular portion made of one material and a tooth structure made of a different material, featuring a recess and protrusion design that allows for secure attachment and press-fitting, enhancing the integration and durability of the sprocket with the hub axle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the sprocket supporting member is made of a single material, then the structure is simpler, but the integration and durability with the sprocket are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestructureVSAvoidintegration and durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sprocket supporting member is constructed as a composite structure with a tubular portion made of aluminum alloy and a tooth portion made of steel alloy. This composite material approach allows the tubular portion to provide lightweight structural support while the steel tooth portion provides durable engagement with the sprocket, thereby resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and integration durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the tooth portion is integrally formed with the tubular portion, then the structure is more robust, but the manufacturing complexity and material selection flexibility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural robustnessVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The sprocket supporting member is divided into two separate portions: a tubular portion and a tooth portion. These segments are manufactured separately using materials optimized for their specific functions, then joined together through press-fitting. This segmentation allows for easier manufacturing and greater material selection flexibility while maintaining structural robustness through the secure connection between portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If a press-fitting connection is used between the tooth portion and tubular portion, then the integration is more secure, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration securityVSAvoidpress-fitting precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The press-fitting connection utilizes controlled parameter changes in the form of dimensional tolerances and interference fits between the tooth portion and tubular portion. By carefully designing the fit parameters, the connection achieves secure integration while accommodating reasonable manufacturing variations, thereby balancing integration security with manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9731550B2Bicycle hub assembly
Publication Date: 2017.08.15 SHIMANO INC
  • US9731550B2 patent drawing
  • US9731550B2 patent drawing
  • US9731550B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bicycle hub assembly includes a hub axle, a hub shell, and a sprocket supporting member. The sprocket supporting member includes a tubular portion and a first tooth. The tubular portion includes an outer peripheral surface and an attachment portion provided only radially inward of the outer peripheral surface. The first tooth is configured to be attached to the attachment portion of the tubular portion. The first tooth includes a first surface and a second surface. The first surface is configured to face a mounting portion of a bicycle sprocket in a circumferential direction of the sprocket supporting member. The second surface is opposite to the first surface in the circumferential direction. The second surface is configured to face the mounting portion of the bicycle sprocket in the circumferential direction.