Bicycle Saddle with Compressible Nose and Flanges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bicycle saddles fail to provide comfortable and stable support for riders across various cycling positions, leading to discomfort and loss of control when transitioning between upright and aerodynamic positions, due to inadequate anatomical design and focus on weight reduction and aesthetics.

Innovation Solution

A bicycle saddle design featuring a rearward seat portion with a centrally disposed soft compressible nose and downwardly sloping lateral flanges that provide continuous support to the ischial tuberosities and absorb pressure on the pudendal region, maintaining contact and control through all cycling positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the saddle is designed to be smaller, narrower, lighter, and harder for racing positions, then weight reduction is achieved, but comfort and anatomical support are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaddle weightVSAvoidcomfort and anatomical support
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The saddle applies different material properties to different regions: the nose uses soft compressible material for pudendal region support, the seat portion uses firmer material for ischial tuberosity support, and lateral flanges provide structured support. This localized differentiation allows the saddle to be anatomically appropriate in each zone without requiring overall increased weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The saddle is divided into functionally distinct segments: a nose portion for perineal support, a seat portion for sit bone support, and lateral flanges for positional support. Each segment can be optimized independently for its specific function, allowing weight reduction in non-critical areas while maintaining comfort in critical zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If the saddle nose is made hard for structural support, then stability is improved, but discomfort and pressure on the pudendal region increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaddle stabilityVSAvoidpressure and discomfort on pudendal region
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The nose portion specifically uses soft compressible material to reduce pressure on the pudendal region while the lateral flanges and seat portion maintain firmer structures for stability. This localized softness in the nose area eliminates harmful pressure without compromising overall saddle stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the saddle is designed for upright cruising position with more cushioning, then comfort in cruising position is improved, but aerodynamic performance and support in racing position are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort in cruising positionVSAvoidsupport in aerodynamic position
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The saddle design with lateral flanges and anatomical nose provides universal support for multiple cycling positions. The lateral flanges support the rider in both upright and aerodynamic positions, while the anatomical nose accommodates the pudendal region regardless of position, making the saddle adaptable to both cruising and racing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The saddle maintains consistent anatomical support parameters (nose support, flange positioning) across different riding positions. By keeping the structural parameters constant rather than changing cushioning levels, the saddle provides reliable support in both upright and aerodynamic positions without compromising either comfort or performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the saddle lacks a centrally disposed nose or has a split nose design, then perineal pressure distribution may be improved, but loss of control and stability during position transitions occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperineal pressure distributionVSAvoidsaddle control and stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The centrally disposed nose provides localized support to the pudendal region with soft compressible material, distributing pressure appropriately in this specific area. The presence of a central nose rather than split or absent design maintains stability during position transitions while still protecting the perineal region through localized softness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The saddle design ensures comfortable support and control across all cycling positions, reducing discomfort and preventing loss of contact, thereby enhancing performance and rider stability during transitions.

Implementation Method 1

a centrally disposed soft compressible nose adapted to support the rider's pudendal or pelvic anatomy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

the nose adapted to support the rider's pudendal or pelvic anatomy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 3

the sloping flanges provide continuous support to the ischial tuberosities as the rider slides forwardly and downwardly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS10556632B2Bicycle saddle
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 PARADIGM IND AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
  • US10556632B2 patent drawing
  • US10556632B2 patent drawing
  • US10556632B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bicycle saddle for attaching to a bicycle seat post including a rearward seat portion extending forwardly to a soft compressible nose. The seat portion adapted to support a rider's ischial tuberosities in the cruising position. The nose adapted to support the rider's pudendal or pelvic anatomy. The seat portion having downwardly sloped lateral flanges disposed either side of the nose wherein the flanges continue to provide support to the ischial tuberosities. Any increase in perineal and pudendal pressure is substantially absorbed by the compressibility of the nose such that maintaining continuous contact with the seat portion and nose enables full saddle control as the rider shifts from the cruising to an aerodynamic or racing position.