Bicycle Seat Pack Structure for Stable Saddle and Seatpost Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional seat packs for bicycles suffer from issues such as lateral and vertical instability, susceptibility to mud clogging, excessive weight, propensity for breakage, limited compatibility with various seat posts and saddles, time-consuming fitting and removal processes, and vulnerability to damage from the rear wheel and saddle.

Innovation Solution

A seat pack design comprising a bag component with integrated structural support and mounting portions for secure attachment to both the seatpost and saddle, using resilient straps and buckles that accommodate different positions and shapes, and a rigid internal support structure to maintain stability and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a conventional seat pack is used, then it can be attached to the bicycle, but it suffers from lateral and vertical instability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidinstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The seat pack is divided into separate functional components: a bag component for storage and a structural support component for stability. The structural support component includes dedicated mounting portions with straps and buckles that independently secure the bag to both the seatpost and saddle, resolving the instability issue through segmented functional design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting portions are integrated into the structural support component, combining the attachment function with the support structure. This merging ensures that the bag and support component work together as a unified system that maintains stability through coordinated attachment to both seatpost and saddle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional seat packs are used, then they can be attached to the bicycle, but they are susceptible to mud clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemud cloggingVSAvoidsusceptibility to mud
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting portions are designed with specific local characteristics - the straps and buckles are positioned and shaped to minimize exposure to mud. The structural support component's geometry and material selection create surfaces that are less susceptible to mud accumulation, addressing the harmful factor at critical locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Weight of moving object

If conventional seat packs are used, then they can be attached to the bicycle, but they have excessive weight

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidexcessive weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The structural support function is extracted from the bag component and placed in a separate structural support component. This extraction allows the bag to be made from lighter materials while the support structure provides the necessary stability, reducing overall weight by optimizing each component's material selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The seat pack utilizes composite construction combining lightweight bag materials with strategically placed structural support elements. The structural support component uses materials optimized for strength-to-weight ratio, creating a composite system that achieves stability without excessive weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If conventional seat packs are used, then they can be attached to the bicycle, but they have limited compatibility with various seat posts and saddles

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecompatibilityVSAvoidlimited compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting portions are designed with universal attachment capabilities - the straps and buckles can accommodate various seatpost diameters and saddle types. The structural support component's geometry and adjustment mechanisms provide multi-functionality, allowing the same design to work across different bicycle configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting system incorporates adjustable and flexible elements that can adapt to different seatpost and saddle configurations. The dynamic adjustment capabilities of the straps and buckles allow the seat pack to maintain secure attachment across a wide range of bicycle components, enhancing compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Ease of operation

If conventional seat packs are used, then they can be attached to the bicycle, but the fitting and removal processes are time-consuming and tricky

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitting and removalVSAvoidtime-consuming
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The structural support component is pre-formed with integrated mounting portions that are ready for immediate attachment. The bag component is pre-configured to receive the structural support component, so that during installation, the user only needs to attach the pre-prepared assembly to the bicycle, significantly reducing the time required for fitting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

6Strength

If conventional seat packs are used, then they can be attached to the bicycle, but they are vulnerable to damage and wear from the rear wheel and saddle

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoiddamage and wear
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The structural support component is designed with protective features that cushion against damage from the rear wheel and saddle. The geometry and material selection of the support structure create a protective barrier that absorbs impact and reduces wear on both the seat pack and the bicycle components it contacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS20260021857A1Seat pack for a bicycle
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 TAILFIN LTD
  • US20260021857A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021857A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021857A1 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a seat pack for a bicycle, the seat pack comprising: a bag component defining an internal volume and having a main opening at one end; and a structural support component received within the internal volume; wherein an outer surface of the structural support component is provided with a first mounting portion for attachment to a seatpost of the bicycle and a second mounting portion for attachment to a saddle of the bicycle; wherein the bag component comprises one or more openings which receive the first mounting portion and the second mounting portion such that the first and second mounting portions project externally from the bag component.