Bicycle Shifting Device with Bidirectional Ratchet Pawls

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bicycle operating devices lack efficient mechanisms for bidirectional control of wire takeup and ratchet systems, which limits their ability to effectively manage cable tension and shifting operations in bicycle transmissions.

Innovation Solution

A bicycle operating device comprising a base member, an operating construction, a wire takeup member, a ratchet member, and pawls that allow for bidirectional rotation and precise control through a system of pivotable parts and ratchet teeth, enabling the device to wind and unwind control cables efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional unidirectional ratchet mechanism is used, then the structure is simple, but the device cannot achieve bidirectional control of cable tension

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebidirectional control capabilityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ratchet member is divided into multiple ratchet teeth arranged in different directions, creating separate engagement paths for forward and backward movements. The first pawl engages with first ratchet teeth for one direction while the second pawl engages with second ratchet teeth for the opposite direction, enabling bidirectional control through segmented engagement surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The actuating member serves multiple functions: it simultaneously moves the first pawl away from the ratchet member, positions the second pawl for engagement, and controls the timing of pawl transitions. This multi-functional design achieves bidirectional control without requiring separate mechanisms for each direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If multiple pawls are introduced for bidirectional control, then bidirectional operation is enabled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebidirectional operation smoothnessVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuating member integrates multiple control functions into a single component that simultaneously manages both pawls. By combining the functions of moving the first pawl away, positioning the second pawl, and coordinating their transitions into one actuating mechanism, the design reduces operational complexity despite having multiple pawls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The pawls are designed to dynamically transition between engaged and disengaged states based on the direction of operation. The actuating member enables smooth transitions by sequentially moving pawls in and out of engagement with the ratchet teeth, allowing the system to adapt its configuration based on the required direction of cable tension control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the wire takeup member is made rotatable in both directions, then bidirectional cable control is achieved, but control precision may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable tension control flexibilityVSAvoidcable position control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The ratchet member acts as an intermediary between the bidirectionally rotatable wire takeup member and the cable tension control system. The ratchet teeth provide discrete, precisely defined engagement positions that translate the continuous rotation of the wire takeup member into controlled, precise cable tension adjustments in both directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the ratchet member have different local characteristics: first ratchet teeth are optimized for engagement with the first pawl in one direction, while second ratchet teeth are optimized for engagement with the second pawl in the opposite direction. This local differentiation maintains control precision for each directional movement despite the overall bidirectional capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9919760B2Bicycle operating device
Publication Date: 2018.03.20 SHIMANO INC
  • US9919760B2 patent drawing
  • US9919760B2 patent drawing
  • US9919760B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bicycle operating device comprises a base member, an operating construction, a wire takeup member, a ratchet member, a first pawl, and an actuating member. The wire takeup member is configured to be rotatable relative to the base member about a rotational axis in a first direction and a second direction. The ratchet member has ratchet teeth. The actuating member includes a second pawl. The actuating member is configured to move the first pawl away from the ratchet member and to engage the second pawl with one of the ratchet teeth, in response to a second operation of the operating construction.