Bicycle Suspension Control Using Axle Acceleration Sensing
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing human-powered vehicle control systems do not effectively utilize acceleration sensors for purposes beyond correcting pitch angle, limiting their functionality in enhancing rider operations and terrain adaptation.
Innovation Solution
A control device for human-powered vehicles that includes acceleration sensors positioned on the wheel axle or closer to it than the suspension, detecting fore-aft, vertical, and lateral accelerations to determine rider operations and terrain conditions, using an electronic controller to generate information for improved operation and terrain awareness.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If the acceleration sensor is positioned on the frame or handlebar, then the pitch angle correction function is achieved, but the detection of rider operations and terrain conditions is insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent divides the acceleration sensing function into multiple sensors positioned at different locations on the vehicle (front wheel axle, rear wheel axle, and/or frame). Each sensor captures specific acceleration components related to different functions: wheel axle sensors detect terrain conditions through vertical acceleration, while frame sensors detect rider operations through fore-aft acceleration. This segmentation allows each sensor to be optimized for its specific detection purpose.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent transitions from using acceleration sensors only for pitch angle correction (single function) to utilizing them for multiple dimensions of detection: rider operations (fore-aft acceleration), terrain conditions (vertical acceleration), and vehicle dynamics. By adding the wheel axle dimension as a sensor location, the system gains access to terrain information that was previously unavailable.
2Measurement precision
If the acceleration sensor is positioned away from the wheel axle, then the installation is simpler, but the detection of terrain conditions and rider operations becomes less accurate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by positioning acceleration sensors at specific locations (wheel axles and/or frame) where they can optimally detect local physical phenomena. The wheel axle location provides direct access to terrain-induced vertical accelerations, while the frame location captures rider-operated fore-aft accelerations. Each location is selected for its specific detection quality rather than using a single universal position.
3Productivity
If the acceleration sensor is used only for pitch angle correction, then the system is simpler, but the utilization of acceleration data is insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent makes the acceleration sensor system universal by enabling it to perform multiple functions: pitch angle correction (original function), rider operation detection (new function), and terrain condition detection (new function). The electronic controller processes acceleration data from multiple sensors to simultaneously achieve these different objectives, maximizing the utility of the sensing system without requiring separate sensors for each function.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the electronic controller continuously monitors acceleration data from multiple sensors and uses this information to adjust vehicle control parameters. The detected rider operations and terrain conditions provide feedback that enables real-time adaptation of suspension control and other vehicle systems, improving overall vehicle performance and rider experience.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Enhances the ability to detect and adapt to rider operations and terrain conditions, allowing for more precise control and improved performance of human-powered vehicles.
Implementation Method 1
The operation detector includes an acceleration sensor provided on at least one of a wheel axle of the human-powered vehicle and a portion of the human-powered vehicle closer to the wheel axle than a moving portion of the suspension. The first parameter includes acceleration in a fore-aft direction of the human-powered vehicle.
Implementation Method 2
The terrain detector includes a first acceleration sensor. The second parameter includes acceleration in a vertical direction of the human-powered vehicle. The electronic controller is configured to determine unevenness of the road from the acceleration in the vertical direction.
Implementation Method 3
The terrain detector includes a second acceleration sensor. The second parameter includes acceleration in a lateral direction of the human-powered vehicle. The electronic controller is configured to determine curving of the road from the acceleration in the lateral direction.
Data Source
AI summary
A control device is provided for a human-powered vehicle that includes a suspension and an operation detector detecting a first parameter correlated to a predetermined operation performed by a rider on the human-powered vehicle. The operation detector includes an acceleration sensor provided on at least one of a wheel axle of the human-powered vehicle and a portion of the human-powered vehicle closer to the wheel axle than a moving portion of the suspension. The first parameter includes acceleration in a fore-aft direction of the human-powered vehicle. The control device includes an electronic controller. The electronic controller is configured to determine the predetermined operation based on the acceleration in the fore-aft direction. The predetermined operation includes at least one of a first operation in which the rider pushes a handlebar of the human-powered vehicle and a second operation in which the rider pulls the handlebar.


