Bicycle Suspension Damping Control for Changing Riding Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bicycle suspension systems lack the ability to automatically adjust damping levels in real-time based on varying riding conditions and bicycle states, leading to suboptimal performance and rider experience.

Innovation Solution

A suspension component for bicycles that includes a damper operable in multiple damping states, a motion controller to adjust the damper between these states, and a processor that uses sensor data to activate the motion controller, allowing for automatic adjustments of the damping level based on detected parameters such as pedaling, vibration, and pitch angle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustment of damping levels is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to varying riding conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to riding conditionsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system transitions from static manual adjustment to dynamic automatic adjustment. The processor continuously monitors sensor data (accelerometers, gyroscopes, pedaling detection) and dynamically changes damping levels in real-time based on detected riding conditions, terrain, and bicycle state, making the system adaptive without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback control by continuously sensing riding conditions through multiple sensors, processing this information to determine optimal damping settings, and adjusting the damper accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables the system to automatically adapt to changing conditions while maintaining controlled complexity through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If automatic adjustment system is implemented, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic adjustment capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor serves multiple functions: it processes sensor data from accelerometers and gyroscopes, detects pedaling states, determines bicycle pitch angles, selects appropriate damping levels, and controls the motion controller. This multi-functionality consolidates what could be multiple separate systems into a single integrated unit, improving adaptability while managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The suspension system is self-regulating, using its own sensor data to automatically determine and adjust damping levels without external input. The system monitors its own state (through integrated sensors) and makes independent adjustment decisions, reducing the need for complex external control systems or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are used for detection, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sensors (accelerometers, gyroscopes, pedaling detection sensors) are merged into a single integrated sensing system processed by one processor. This consolidation allows the system to achieve high measurement precision through multiple data sources while managing complexity by processing all sensor inputs through a unified control algorithm rather than requiring separate control systems for each sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250026167A1Adjustable suspension components for bicycles
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 SRAM LLC
  • US20250026167A1 patent drawing
  • US20250026167A1 patent drawing
  • US20250026167A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Example adjustable suspension components for bicycles are described herein. An example bicycle suspension component includes a damper operable in a low damping state, a high damping state, and an intermediate damping state between the low damping state and the high damping state, a motion controller operable to change the damper between the low damping state, the intermediate damping state, and the high damping state, and a processor to, based on sensor data, activate the motion controller to change the damper between the intermediate damping state and one of the low damping state or the high damping state.