Bicycle Suspension Control with Route Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing suspension control systems for two-wheelers, such as bicycles, require frequent adjustments in damping properties based on terrain and user preferences, leading to increased user input and distraction during operation.

Innovation Solution

A chassis control system with a control device, memory device, and operating device that learns and stores route-related data to automatically adjust damping properties, allowing for fewer user interventions and optimized settings over repeated routes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the user manually adjusts damping properties frequently to adapt to changing terrain conditions, then the adaptability of the suspension system is improved, but the user distraction and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of suspension systemVSAvoiduser distraction during operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically adjusts damping properties by detecting terrain conditions and user preferences through sensors, eliminating the need for manual intervention. The system serves itself by continuously monitoring and adapting suspension characteristics based on real-time data from accelerometers, gyroscopes, and other sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-loads multiple damping profiles into memory, each optimized for specific terrain conditions or user preferences. When a particular condition is detected, the corresponding pre-configured profile is automatically activated, allowing the system to prepare and switch between different suspension characteristics in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the damping properties are manually changed for different terrain conditions, then the performance on specific terrain is optimized, but the number of required user interventions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance optimization on terrainVSAvoidnumber of user interventions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors terrain conditions using sensors such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, and automatically adjusts damping properties based on this feedback. The control device processes sensor data in real-time and modifies suspension characteristics without requiring user input, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts autonomously to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical adjustment of damping properties is replaced by an electronic control system that uses sensors, microprocessors, and actuators to automatically modify suspension characteristics. This substitution eliminates the need for manual intervention while maintaining or improving performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple damping profiles are available for different terrains and users, then the versatility of the system is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariety of damping settingsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single control system integrates multiple functions including terrain detection, user preference storage, automatic profile selection, and manual override capabilities. The system can operate in different modes (automatic, semi-automatic, manual) and serves multiple user needs through a unified interface, reducing the need for separate systems for different functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically switches between different operating modes and damping profiles based on detected conditions. The system can transition from fully automatic operation to manual control as needed, and can store multiple profiles in memory while selectively activating the most appropriate one based on real-time sensor data and user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2468616B1Suspension control for a bicycle
Publication Date: 2015.07.08 DT SWISS AG
  • EP2468616B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2468616B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2468616B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Chassis control (100) and method for controlling a chassis for a muscle-powered two-wheeler with a damping device (1) comprising a first damping chamber and a second damping chamber, which are coupled to each other via a controllable damping valve. A sensor (5) is provided which acquires data about a current operating state. An electrical control unit (8) and a storage device (9) are provided for controlling the damping device, such that at least one damping characteristic of the damping device can be influenced by a signal from the control unit. The control unit is designed and configured to provide a learning mode in which route-related data are stored in the storage device.The control unit is further designed and configured to provide a repeat mode in which the damper unit is controlled according to the route-related data stored in the memory unit.