Automated Bid Adjustment Using CPC Decay Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional approaches to determining bid prices for advertisements in electronic environments often fail to accurately consider factors like cost per click and advertiser willingness to pay, leading to inefficient ad placement and revenue generation.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that calculates bid prices by incorporating cost per click information, CPC ratio, and other factors, using a bidding chain and decay analysis to adjust bid multipliers and determine optimal bid prices, ensuring efficient ad placement and revenue alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional bidding approaches are used to determine ad prices, then the bidding process is simple, but the bid accuracy and revenue optimization are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebid accuracyVSAvoidbidding system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bidding system is segmented into multiple independent components: base bid determination module, CPC data collection module, decay calculation module, and bid adjustment module. Each component handles a specific aspect of the bidding process, allowing complex calculations to be broken down into manageable segments that improve bid accuracy without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting CPC data and calculating decay values before final bid determination. Historical CPC data is gathered and processed in advance, and decay factors are pre-calculated based on data recency, enabling more accurate bid adjustments while maintaining systematic organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If bid prices are adjusted manually to improve efficiency, then some optimization is achieved, but the process is time-consuming and cannot adapt dynamically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising efficiencyVSAvoidtime for bid adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where actual CPC data from ad performances is collected, analyzed, and fed back into the bid adjustment mechanism. Decay values are recalculated based on recency of data, and bid prices are automatically adjusted according to current efficiency metrics, enabling dynamic optimization without manual intervention and eliminating time delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The bidding system performs self-service by automatically determining optimal bid prices based on collected CPC data and calculated decay values. The system autonomously adjusts bid multipliers and final bid prices without requiring manual advertiser input, continuously optimizing advertising efficiency while eliminating time-consuming manual adjustment processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If rollup keywords are used to forecast efficiency, then data availability increases, but the bid may be too low to show and gather necessary data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata availabilityVSAvoidbid competitiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts bid prices by incorporating decay values that reflect the recency and relevance of CPC data. Rather than using static rollup forecasts, the bid adjustment mechanism adapts in real-time based on current performance data, ensuring bids remain competitive while still utilizing available data from rollup keywords when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of bid price by applying a bid multiplier that is calculated based on CPC data and decay values. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows the system to overcome the limitation of static rollup forecasting, ensuring bids are sufficiently competitive to win impressions while still leveraging available data from related keywords for forecast accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8719082B1Automatic bid adjustments for electronic advertising
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US8719082B1 patent drawing
  • US8719082B1 patent drawing
  • US8719082B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The accuracy of bid amounts for electronic advertising is improved by accounting for factors such as the cost-per-click (CPC) ratio for each ad. When a provider such as a search engine selects advertisements using automated auctions, it can be desirable for an advertiser to avoid underbidding for ads when the ads generate a significant amount of revenue or profit, or are otherwise performing well. Various algorithms can be used to generate a bid adjustment factor that allows bid values to be increased (or decreased) as appropriate, based on information such as CPC information. By calculating a separate adjustment factor, the amount of adjustment can be monitored and/or capped to avoid overspending. The algorithms also can utilize information at various levels of categorization, and at different time intervals, depending on the amount and type of information available, in order to provide an accurate and significant result.