Crowdsourced Answer Selection for Automated Bid Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated RFP response management tools fail to consider the context of questions and the likelihood of answer success, leading to suboptimal response generation due to lack of contextual analysis and success metrics.

Innovation Solution

A crowdsourced method involving natural language processing to cluster semantically similar questions, map answers based on past responses, and dynamically adjust ratings for answer selection, ensuring the inclusion of the most effective answers in response documents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated tools use a centralized repository of past answers with metadata tagging and classification, then answer selection efficiency is improved, but contextual relevance and answer quality are worsened because the tools do not account for the context of the RFP or semantic similarity between questions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanswer selection efficiencyVSAvoidcontextual relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual/context-based answer selection with natural language processing and machine learning algorithms. The system automatically analyzes question semantics, clusters semantically similar questions, and retrieves relevant answers from the repository without human intervention, thus maintaining high efficiency while improving contextual relevance through computational analysis of question meaning and RFP context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the answer selection process by changing the parameters used for matching. Instead of relying solely on exact text matching or basic metadata tags, the system uses semantic analysis parameters to cluster questions by meaning and retrieves answers based on semantic similarity and contextual relevance, thereby improving answer quality while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If the system retrieves answers from past responses without considering success likelihood, then response generation speed is improved, but response effectiveness is worsened due to lack of win rate optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse generation speedVSAvoidresponse effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system tracks and analyzes the success outcomes of previously used answers. By monitoring win rates and performance metrics associated with specific answers, the system learns which answers lead to successful outcomes and prioritizes their selection, thereby improving response effectiveness while maintaining automated speed through data-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If the system treats each question as distinct without semantic analysis, then processing complexity is reduced, but answer accuracy is worsened because semantically identical questions with different wording are not recognized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidanswer accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges semantically similar questions into clusters based on natural language processing analysis. By grouping questions that have the same meaning despite different wording, the system retrieves a broader set of potentially relevant answers from the repository, thereby improving answer accuracy while managing complexity through automated semantic clustering rather than manual analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11360974B2Ontology driven crowd sourced multi-dimensional question-answer processing for automated bid processing for rapid bid submission and win rate enhancement
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 BIDIFY LTD
  • US11360974B2 patent drawing
  • US11360974B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for crowdsourced answer selection for question-answer processing in automated commercial tender document (CTD) response generation includes populating a database with questions extracted from past CTDs and clustering the questions into groups of similar questions. Then, for each of the genus questions, a set of answers submitted in respectively different responses by multiple different responders are mapped to different ones of the past CTDs in connection with the genus question. Thereafter, the responses are rated and a present response document for a present CTD and also the present CTD are loaded into an editor. A question is extracted from the present CTD and the database queried with the extracted question. In response, a set of answers mapped to a genus question for the extracted question is retrieved and an answer in the set having a highest rating is inserted into the present response document for the extracted question.