Bid Solicitation System Modular Vendor Pre-Qualification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The construction industry lacks a comprehensive digitalized project management system that can efficiently convert design component data into a standardized format for automation, and effectively solicit bids from vendors with the capability to meet project requirements.

Innovation Solution

The AUTOBUILD Bid Solicitation System, which comprises networked computers and software-based modular components, processes project design data to identify material, equipment, and labor needs, then solicits bids from pre-qualified vendors capable of meeting these requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a comprehensive digitalized project management system is implemented, then bid solicitation efficiency and vendor matching accuracy are improved, but system complexity and implementation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebid solicitation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the bid solicitation process into distinct modular components: project requirement analysis module, vendor pre-qualification module, bid solicitation module, and evaluation module. Each module handles specific tasks independently, improving efficiency without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Vendors undergo pre-qualification and capability assessment before being added to the database. Project requirements are standardized and structured in advance. These preliminary actions enable automated matching and reduce the complexity of real-time decision-making during bid solicitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If design component data is converted into standardized format for automation, then processing speed and accuracy are improved, but data preparation time and effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing accuracyVSAvoiddata preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes standardized data formats and templates for project requirements in advance. Design component data is pre-processed and structured before entering the automated system, enabling faster and more accurate processing without repeating data preparation for each project.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms unstructured design component data into standardized parameters and categories that can be automatically processed. By changing the data representation from free-text to structured parameters, the system achieves both accuracy and processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If vendors are pre-qualified and rated based on multiple criteria, then bid quality and project success rate are improved, but vendor evaluation complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevendor capability assuranceVSAvoidevaluation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vendor evaluation process is divided into separate criteria: financial stability, technical capability, past performance, and resource availability. Each criterion is assessed independently using standardized metrics, making the complex evaluation process manageable and systematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Vendors self-assess and submit their capabilities and qualifications through the system. This reduces the burden on evaluators and standardizes the data collection process, improving reliability without proportionally increasing evaluation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If automated bid solicitation is implemented, then error reduction and consistency are improved, but system implementation cost and technical requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebid solicitation consistencyVSAvoidtechnical infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual bid solicitation processes with automated computer-based operations. Software algorithms handle vendor matching, invitation sending, and bid collection, ensuring consistency and reducing human errors without requiring complex physical infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12223542B1Bid solicitation system
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 KRAUSE RICHARD A
  • US12223542B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The Bid Solicitation System and Method according to the present invention solicits vendors involved with all aspects of construction materials, equipment, and services wishing to be alerted of construction projects of wide variety provided vendor capabilities meet certain parameters established by the Bid Solicitation System and Method. The vendor, after reviewing the detailed requirements including time of delivery or services, can choose whether it wishes to provide a bid to be considered. To be part of the process, the vendor is first required to fill out an extensive application and provide a reasonable amount of backup support documentation all of which is verified by the Bid Solicitation System and Method. The system then generates a Request for Bid and delivers the Request for Bid to applicable vendors that provide such item(s) to support a conventional or automated construction processes.