Bidding Strategy Using Inventory Forecasting for First-Price Auctions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the context of programmatic advertising, advertisers face challenges in optimizing bids in first-price auctions due to the complexity of predicting other bidders' actions, leading to potential overpayment and suboptimal campaign performance, especially in repeated auctions where conventional bid shading techniques fall short in balancing multiple objectives.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an advanced bidding strategy that combines Inventory Forecasting and Strategy Search, utilizing combinatorial optimization methods to determine optimal bid prices and decide whether to bid or abstain, based on historical data and real-time auction dynamics, thereby optimizing cost per action (CPA) and other key performance indicators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If bid shading is used to mitigate overpayment risk in first-price auctions, then the risk of overpaying is reduced, but the bidding strategy becomes suboptimal in repeated auctions with multiple objectives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk mitigationVSAvoidcampaign performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by forecasting the joint distribution of auction parameters (win rates, costs, KPIs) before making bidding decisions. This allows the bid optimizer to evaluate multiple bidding strategies in advance and select the optimal one, rather than relying on reactive bid shading after bids are submitted. The forecasted distribution enables proactive optimization across multiple objectives simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transitioning from deterministic bid shading to probabilistic bidding based on forecasted joint distributions. Instead of applying fixed shading rules, the system uses the predicted distribution of auction outcomes to dynamically adjust bid prices, win rate targets, and budget allocation across repeated auctions, optimizing for multiple KPIs simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If conventional bid shading techniques are applied, then overpayment is mitigated, but multiple objectives cannot be balanced effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising budget efficiencyVSAvoidmulti-objective optimization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by creating a unified bid optimization framework that simultaneously handles multiple objectives (CPA, ROAS, win rates, budget pacing) within a single probabilistic model. The joint distribution forecast enables the system to evaluate trade-offs between competing objectives and select bidding strategies that balance all goals, rather than optimizing for a single metric like traditional bid shading does.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using actual auction outcomes to update and refine the forecasted joint distribution of auction parameters over time. This learning mechanism allows the system to adapt its bidding strategy based on observed patterns in competitor behavior, auction dynamics, and campaign performance, continuously improving optimization across multiple objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If real-time bidding decisions are made without offline optimization, then bidding speed is maintained, but optimal bid prices cannot be determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebidding response timeVSAvoidbid price optimization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization offline by forecasting the joint distribution of auction parameters and pre-computing optimal bidding strategies based on multiple objectives. This pre-computation creates lookup tables or pre-trained models that can be quickly queried during real-time bidding, separating the computationally intensive optimization work from the time-critical bid submission process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides a cushioning effect by preparing forecasted joint distributions and pre-evaluating multiple bidding strategies in advance, creating a buffer of pre-computed insights that protects against the computational limitations of real-time decision-making. This beforehand preparation ensures that even under time pressure, the system can access optimized bidding recommendations without sacrificing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS20250022047A1Systems and Methods for Optimal Bidding in Repeated Online First-Price Auctions
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 COGNITIV CORP
  • US20250022047A1 patent drawing
  • US20250022047A1 patent drawing
  • US20250022047A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, and methods for determining an optimal bidding strategy that outperforms bid shading in situations that involve repeated bids into first-price auctions. An approach termed Inventory Forecasting is developed, that functions to convert the online real-time repeating auction scenario into a problem that can be optimized offline. Inventory forecasting summarizes auctions with a small number of parameters and then forecasts the joint distribution of these parameters based on historical data. An approach termed Strategy Search is developed that uses combinatorial optimization methods to search for a bidding strategy that produces the best campaign performance while still meeting specific constraints.