Bidding Strategy Optimization via Predictive User Event Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Content sponsors face challenges in optimizing their bidding strategies for online advertising campaigns, as existing systems lack the ability to predict future user interactions and adjust bids effectively based on historical data and interaction rates, leading to suboptimal ad placement and revenue generation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine bidding strategies by analyzing historical data to predict future user events, calculating interaction rates, and adjusting bids to optimize value, presenting multiple strategies to content sponsors through graphical representations and lists, allowing for goal-based optimization and incremental bid changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If content sponsors use traditional bidding systems without prediction capabilities, then the system simplicity is maintained, but the bidding optimization and revenue generation are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue generationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future user interactions and events before the actual bidding occurs. Historical data is analyzed in advance to forecast future user behavior, allowing sponsors to optimize bids proactively rather than reactively, thereby improving revenue generation without requiring complex real-time decision systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces prediction models and analytical systems as intermediaries between historical data and bidding decisions. These intermediaries process and interpret data to generate actionable insights, bridging the gap between raw data and optimal bidding strategies, thus enhancing productivity while managing complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If content sponsors adjust bids frequently based on real-time data, then the adaptability to user interactions is improved, but the complexity of bid management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebid adaptabilityVSAvoidbid management ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically generating and adjusting bidding strategies based on predicted future events and historical patterns. The automated bid management reduces manual intervention requirements while maintaining high adaptability to user interactions, as the system autonomously optimizes bids according to forecasted outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where bid performance data is continuously collected and fed back into the prediction models. This closed-loop system allows the models to learn from actual outcomes and refine future predictions, enhancing bid adaptability while simplifying management through data-driven automated adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If content sponsors focus on short-term bid optimization, then the immediate revenue is maximized, but the long-term campaign performance may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmediate revenueVSAvoidcampaign duration performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The prediction models perform preliminary analysis of long-term campaign trends and user behavior patterns, allowing sponsors to make bid decisions that balance immediate revenue with future performance. By forecasting future events, the system prevents short-sighted optimization that could harm long-term campaign health

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts bidding strategies based on the campaign lifecycle stage and predicted future performance. Bid parameters are made flexible and adaptive, allowing the system to shift between short-term revenue maximization and long-term performance preservation depending on real-time conditions and forecasts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If detailed historical data is analyzed to improve prediction accuracy, then the measurement precision of user events is improved, but the data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser event prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses on the most relevant features and patterns from historical data that have the highest predictive value. By selecting only the critical data elements needed for accurate predictions, the system maintains high measurement precision while reducing the volume of data that requires processing, thus minimizing time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the data processing into distinct stages and components, allowing parallel processing of different data sets and predictive models. This segmentation enables efficient utilization of computational resources and reduces overall processing time while maintaining comprehensive analysis for accurate predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10318985B2Determining bidding strategies
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 GOOGLE LLC
  • US10318985B2 patent drawing
  • US10318985B2 patent drawing
  • US10318985B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for determining bidding strategies. A method includes: identifying a campaign including one or more selection criteria and associated bids; determining a value associated with a user event associated with presentation of a campaign content item; determining one or more predicted future events based on the selection criteria and historical data; determining aggregate values based on the determined predicted future events, using the value and hypothetical bid changes; determining an interaction rate associated with the content item and a cost per event; determining a plurality of bidding strategies for the campaign, each reflecting a change in a bid associated with one or more selection criteria that optimizes the content sponsor's value; and presenting the plurality of bidding strategies to the content sponsor.