Construction Bidding System Standardization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The construction industry lacks a standardized and consistent method for contractor bidding, leading to misjudgments, wasted time, and increased costs due to varying bid formats and inconsistencies between general contractors and subcontractors, making it difficult for construction managers to compare and negotiate bids effectively.

Innovation Solution

A multi-tiered web-based software system that standardizes the bidding process by allowing construction managers to dictate the format and level of detail for both general contractors and subcontractors, ensuring all bids are presented in a consistent and detailed manner, using a server-hosted website with associated databases for project management and bid tracking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If general contractors and subcontractors use different bid structures and software programs, then each contractor can use their preferred tools and methods, but it becomes very difficult to compare bids side-by-side and easy to overlook inconsistencies

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveContractor choice of bid structure and softwareVSAvoidBid comparison accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a standardized bid template as an intermediary that all contractors must use when submitting bids. This template acts as a common language or mediator between diverse contractor systems, enabling accurate comparison while preserving contractor autonomy in their internal processes. The template standardizes categories, line items, and formatting without dictating which software contractors use to prepare their bids.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements homogeneity by requiring all bids to conform to a uniform standardized template structure. This ensures that all bids present information in the same format with consistent categories and line items, making comparison straightforward and reducing errors. The template creates a homogeneous presentation layer while allowing diversity in the underlying contractor systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

2Reliability

If construction managers manually review and adjust bids from multiple contractors, then they can identify inconsistencies and allowances, but the process becomes time-consuming and prone to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveBid evaluation accuracyVSAvoidBid review time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical review process with automated computational processing. Software automatically parses standardized bid templates, extracts data, compares line items across contractors, identifies inconsistencies, and calculates adjustments. This substitution eliminates human error and dramatically reduces review time while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms where the software immediately identifies discrepancies, missing information, or inconsistent allowances across bids and communicates these to the construction manager. This real-time feedback eliminates the need for manual checking and allows rapid identification of issues that require attention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If contractors provide detailed line item bids, then the construction manager can identify discrepancies and ensure apples-to-apples comparison, but the complexity of reviewing and analyzing all line items increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveBid detail accuracyVSAvoidBid review complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex bid review process into manageable components through standardized categorization. The template divides bids into distinct sections and categories (e.g., labor, materials, equipment, allowances), allowing the construction manager to systematically review each segment rather than being overwhelmed by the entire bid at once. This structured segmentation reduces perceived complexity while maintaining detailed accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7881977B2Construction bidding system and method
Publication Date: 2011.02.01 LEASECORP INC
  • US7881977B2 patent drawing
  • US7881977B2 patent drawing
  • US7881977B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A construction bidding system and method includes manager, general contractor and subcontractor workstations that communicate with a server hosting a website over a network such as the Internet. The server also communicates with a number of databases. A manager enters project information into a project database and selects general contractors from a general contractor database. The manager sends each selected general contractor an invitation to bid. A general contractor receives the invitation to bid, reviews the project information and selects subcontractors from a subcontractor database. The general contractor sends each selected subcontractor an invitation to bid. A subcontractor receives the invitation to bid and responds with bid information that is entered in to a bid database. The general contractor uses the bid information from the subcontractors to prepare and submit a bid to the manager.