Bidirectional Cross-Midline Tissue Retract

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical retractors/stabilizers are not optimized for procedures requiring access to only one side of the patient, as they often retract/stabilize the entire panniculus, which is not necessary for surgeries like hip surgery, leading to inefficient tissue management and access challenges.

Innovation Solution

A retractor/stabilizer with a top layer and backing layer, featuring adhesive, grasping panels, and tabs that allow for bidirectional retraction and stabilization of excessive/redundant tissue, enabling selective tissue management and improved access to target sites without full panniculus retraction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a full-panniculus retractor/stabilizer is used, then complete tissue stabilization is achieved, but device complexity and procedural inefficiency increase for procedures requiring only unilateral access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue stabilizationVSAvoidretractor configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor/stabilizer is divided into a left side portion and a right side portion, allowing selective application to only the required side for procedures such as hip surgery, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining adequate tissue stabilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retractor provides differentiated functionality with grasping panels positioned at specific locations (upper inner corner, lower outer edge) to apply localized retraction forces only where needed for unilateral access procedures, rather than stabilizing the entire panniculus

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the retractor is pulled in a cephalad direction only, then application is simplified, but access to lateral and posterior areas is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretractor applicationVSAvoidaccess to target sites
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor design incorporates multiple grasping panels positioned at different orientations (upper inner corner for diagonal/cross-midline access, lower outer edge for lateral access) that enable bidirectional retraction forces, adding dimensional versatility to the application while maintaining ease of use through intuitive grasping points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If the backing layer is completely removed, then application to the patient is facilitated, but control during positioning is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication to patientVSAvoidloss of control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The backing layer is segmented into removable portions and retained portions, where specific sections can be peeled away to expose adhesive for patient application while other sections remain attached to provide continuous control and support during the positioning process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The partially retained backing layer serves as an intermediary element that mediates between the need for adhesive exposure and the need for control, allowing the operator to maintain grip on the retractor while progressively applying it to the patient's tissue

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates efficient repositioning and stabilization of excessive/redundant tissue, reducing the distance to target areas, enhancing surgical access and procedural efficiency, while minimizing tissue compression and improving anatomical alignment for procedures like hip surgery and imaging.

Implementation Method 1

The top layer has an adhesive applied thereto which is exposed when the backing layer is separated from the top layer to enable the top layer to be applied to a surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS10653404B2Bidirectional cross-midline retractor/stabilizer for excessive and/or redundant tissue
Publication Date: 2020.05.19 GSQUARED MEDICAL LLC
  • US10653404B2 patent drawing
  • US10653404B2 patent drawing
  • US10653404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A die-cuttable retractor/stabilizer for repositioning and stabilizing excessive and/or redundant tissue comprises a top layer and a backing layer. An adhesive on the top layer is exposed when the backing layer is separated from the top layer to enable the top layer to be applied to a surface. The retractor/stabilizer comprises a body having a top edge, side edges and a bottom edge. A tab portion is associated with the removable panel, such that the backing layer remains with the tab portion and the tab portion can be used to remove at least a portion of the backing layer from the retractor/stabilizer body. The retractor/stabilizer additionally includes at least one protected grasping/holding area located at an edge or corner of said retractor/holding area as the backing layer is removed from the body to provide a protected holding area once the backing layer has been removed from the body.