Bidirectional EV Charging Coordination for Grid and Local Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack efficient coordination and control mechanisms for bidirectional electric charge transfer between electric vehicles, home energy systems, and the power grid, particularly in scenarios where data privacy and system integration are concerns.

Innovation Solution

A centralized and distributed power coordination system utilizing cloud-based and local controllers to manage and optimize electric energy transfer, allowing vehicles to discharge excess power to the grid and recharge using renewable energy, while respecting data privacy by enabling local control when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a centralized controller coordinates bidirectional charging between multiple vehicles and the grid, then power distribution efficiency is improved, but system complexity and data privacy concerns increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower distribution efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides control functions between a centralized server for overall coordination and local controllers at charging stations for execution. The server handles high-level scheduling and optimization, while local controllers manage actual charging/discharging operations, reducing the complexity burden on any single component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary communication layer between vehicles, local controllers, and the centralized server. This intermediary protocol manages data exchange and coordination, enabling efficient power distribution while maintaining clear system boundaries and reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Use of energy by moving object

If the system queries vehicles about charge acceptance to optimize power distribution, then energy utilization is improved, but communication time and system responsiveness worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy utilizationVSAvoidcommunication time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary queries with vehicles about their charge acceptance preferences and constraints before peak charging demands occur. This advance planning allows the centralized server to pre-coordinate charging schedules, reducing the need for time-critical communications during high-demand periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where vehicles provide advance information about their charging needs and preferences. The centralized server uses this feedback to optimize power distribution algorithms, improving energy utilization while minimizing real-time communication requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the system commands grid and local controller to supply charge power based on vehicle data, then charging reliability is improved, but control complexity and data processing requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional modules: vehicle data collection, data validation, charging schedule optimization, and execution control. Each module handles specific tasks independently, improving charging reliability through specialized processing while reducing overall control complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of energy

If vehicles discharge excess power to the grid and recharge with renewable energy, then energy efficiency is improved, but system coordination complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidsystem coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Vehicles autonomously determine when they have excess power to discharge and when they need to recharge. The system enables vehicles to self-manage their energy contribution to the grid and their recharging needs, improving overall energy efficiency while reducing the coordination complexity burden on the centralized server.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12508939B2Bidirectional electric vehicle charging system
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12508939B2 patent drawing
  • US12508939B2 patent drawing
  • US12508939B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more controllers may, responsive to a request from a first vehicle to receive a predefined amount of charge power by a specified time, query the first vehicle regarding whether the first vehicle will accept an amount of charge power less than the predefined amount by the specified time, and command a grid and a local controller to each supply charge power to the first vehicle such that the first vehicle receives the amount of charge power less than the predefined amount by the specified time.