Bi-Directional Microgrid for Distributed GPU Energy Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current power management systems for high-performance computing, particularly those utilizing GPUs, face inefficiencies such as high energy consumption, environmental impact, and limited accessibility due to centralized data centers and rigid energy management infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

A smart, bi-directional electrical microgrid of processor-on-demand systems that integrates self-contained energy sources, Energy Management Systems (EMS), distributed power resources, and Large Language Models (LLM) to optimize energy efficiency, integrate renewable energy, and provide on-demand access to processing units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If GPUs are housed in large centralized data centers, then computing power is consolidated and managed, but energy consumption increases and environmental impact worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing resource availabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized data center into distributed edge computing nodes equipped with GPUs. Each edge device independently provides computing resources locally, eliminating the need for a single large data center and reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining service availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimensional centralized architecture to a multi-dimensional distributed architecture across multiple edge devices. This spatial distribution enables computing resources to be available locally at various dimensions (devices, locations, networks), reducing energy transmission distances and improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If static data center infrastructure is used, then initial setup is simplified, but adaptability to dynamic demand changes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfrastructure setupVSAvoidenergy distribution flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource allocation where edge devices can be dynamically activated or deactivated based on real-time computing demands. The system adapts to changing workloads by allocating GPU resources flexibly across available edge devices, unlike static data centers with fixed capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal platform where multiple types of edge devices (smartphones, tablets, PCs, servers) can all serve as computing resources. This multi-functionality allows the system to adapt to diverse computing demands using various device types, enhancing versatility while maintaining ease of deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If geographical centralization of computing resources is implemented, then infrastructure management is simplified, but accessibility for remote users deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfrastructure managementVSAvoiduser accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent places computing resources locally at edge devices distributed across different geographical locations. Users access computing resources from their local area rather than remotely from a centralized data center, improving accessibility and reducing latency while maintaining manageable infrastructure through standardized protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If traditional cloud-based GPU services are used, then access to high-performance computing is provided, but cost barriers increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveGPU accessVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables organizations to deploy their own GPU resources on edge devices, allowing them to serve their own computing needs independently. This self-service model eliminates dependency on expensive cloud providers, reducing operational costs while maintaining ease of access to high-performance computing resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12206243B1Bi-directional electrical microgrid of networked processing-on-demand systems
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 LEKTRA IP LLC
  • US12206243B1 patent drawing
  • US12206243B1 patent drawing
  • US12206243B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A smart, bi-directional electrical microgrid includes processor-on-demand systems, including a computing device having a processing unit and a memory, an Energy Management System (EMS) configured for regulating power usage and optimizing energy efficiency, a distributed power resource for providing a stable and efficient energy supply, a database configured to store energy metrics, a Large Language Model (LLM) for processing the energy metrics stored to generate an energy management plan, an API gateway providing external systems secure, on-demand access to the processing unit, and a software module for managing the processor-on-demand system according to the energy management plan. The microgrid also includes one or more management servers for managing the delivery and distribution of power among the processor-on-demand systems to optimize efficiency and uptime, and a network of power lines that interconnect the processor-on-demand systems.