Bidirectional Oscillating Blade with Segmented Hook Edges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional oscillating cutting blades are limited to cutting in only one direction, restricting their versatility and effectiveness when used with oscillating power tools for materials like asphalt shingles, carpet, and linoleum.

Innovation Solution

The design of an oscillating cutting blade with multiple cutting edges and a sector-shaped body, featuring hook-shaped cutting surfaces and beveled edges, allows for attachment to oscillating power tools, enabling cutting in both push and pull directions by optimizing the cutting edges' geometry and angles for enhanced material engagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional oscillating cutting blades are designed with single cutting edge, then the blade structure is simple, but the blade can cut in only one direction, reducing versatility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting direction versatilityVSAvoidblade structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is segmented into multiple cutting edges (first cutting edge, second cutting edge, third cutting edge) positioned at different locations and orientations on the blade body. Each cutting edge is designed with specific geometry to handle cutting in different directions, allowing the blade to cut effectively in both push and pull directions by engaging different edges accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade is designed as a multi-functional tool where a single blade body incorporates multiple cutting edges that can perform cutting operations in both push and pull directions. The first cutting edge is optimized for push direction cutting while the second and third cutting edges are optimized for pull direction cutting, making the blade universally applicable for bidirectional oscillating cutting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the blade is designed with multiple cutting edges for bidirectional cutting, then cutting versatility is improved, but the blade geometry becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebidirectional cutting capabilityVSAvoidcutting edge geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each cutting edge is designed with locally optimized geometry tailored to its specific cutting direction function. The first cutting edge features geometry optimized for push direction engagement, while the second and third cutting edges have geometry optimized for pull direction engagement. This local quality approach ensures each edge performs its specific function efficiently without requiring complex overall blade design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The blade employs asymmetric geometry in the design of different cutting edges to optimize performance for different cutting directions. The first cutting edge has asymmetric profile suited for push direction, while the second and third cutting edges have different asymmetric profiles suited for pull direction. This asymmetry allows each edge to engage the workpiece optimally in its designated cutting direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Productivity

If conventional blades are designed for single-direction cutting, then manufacturing is simpler, but operational effectiveness is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting operational effectivenessVSAvoidblade manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into stages for creating different cutting edges with distinct geometries. Each cutting edge can be manufactured using appropriate techniques (such as forming, machining, or heat treatment) tailored to its specific geometric requirements, allowing for efficient production of the complex multi-edge blade structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade manufacturing involves changing geometric parameters of different cutting edges to optimize them for different cutting directions. The first cutting edge is manufactured with specific angle and curvature parameters for push direction, while the second and third cutting edges are manufactured with different parameter sets for pull direction, achieving operational effectiveness through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2808137B1Cutting blade for use with oscillating power tool
Publication Date: 2017.05.24 BLACK & DECKER CORP
  • EP2808137B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2808137B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2808137B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

An oscillating cutting blade has a body with an attachment mechanism to couple the oscillating cutting blade with an oscillating tool. The attachment mechanism enables rotation of the body on the oscillating tool. A first cutting surface on the body cuts a workpiece in a pulling direction. A second cutting surface on the body cuts the workpiece in a pushing direction.