Bi-directional Rack Rail Mechanism for Obstruction-Free Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current rail systems for information handling systems only allow sliding motion from one side of the rack, limiting access and making installation, removal, and maintenance challenging due to obstructions like cables and power units, especially in populated racks.

Innovation Solution

A rail mechanism with a new hinge mechanism that allows sliding motion from both the port and rear sides of the rack, featuring a flexible stop that can be engaged or disengaged for either one-sided or two-sided access, and a smaller plate flange to facilitate bi-directional movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional rail system is used with a fixed attachment or one-sided sliding mechanism, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the access flexibility and ease of operation deteriorate because information handling systems can only be accessed from one side

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess flexibilityVSAvoidrail mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rail mechanism is divided into separate components: a rail guide attached to the rack, a mating rail attached to the information handling system, and a hinge mechanism connecting them. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while enabling bi-directional movement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge mechanism introduces dynamic capability to the rail system, allowing the mating rail to pivot and enabling sliding motion from both port and rear sides of the rack. This transforms the static one-sided rail system into a dynamic bi-directional system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If a one-sided rail system is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the productivity deteriorates because installation and removal of information handling systems becomes time-consuming due to obstructions from cables and power units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation and removal efficiencyVSAvoidrail mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of having cables and power units obstruct access from the front, the bi-directional rail system enables access from the rear side of the rack, effectively reversing the access direction and avoiding the obstructions that reduce productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a bi-directional rail mechanism is implemented, then the adaptability improves by allowing access from both port and rear sides, but the device complexity increases due to the hinge mechanism and flexible stop components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess direction flexibilityVSAvoidrail mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rail mechanism serves multiple functions: it guides the information handling system during insertion and removal, provides stopping positions at both ends of the rack, and enables bi-directional movement. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by consolidating multiple features into a single integrated mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible stop mechanism allows the rail system to adapt between one-sided and two-sided access modes by changing the engagement state of the stop, providing parameter-based adaptability without requiring completely different mechanisms for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If a fixed attachment is used instead of a rail mechanism, then the device complexity is minimized, but the ease of operation deteriorates because information handling systems cannot be moved for inspection or maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem mobilityVSAvoidattachment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rail mechanism acts as an intermediary between the fixed rack structure and the movable information handling system, providing guided movement capability while maintaining structural support and positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11985785B2Mechanisms and methods for two-sided rack access
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 DELL PROD LP
  • US11985785B2 patent drawing
  • US11985785B2 patent drawing
  • US11985785B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Traditionally, rail systems for racks that house electronic equipment, such as information handling system only allow motion from one side of the rack, if they allow movement at all. Embodiments presented herein provide mechanisms and methods that allow for motion of information handling systems in a housing from more than just one side of the housing.