Bidirectional Tail Rotor With Fixed-Pitch Reversible Blades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rotorcraft systems are limited by their unidirectional rotor blades, which are optimized for a single direction of rotation and RPM, making them inefficient when reversing direction and requiring complex pitch control mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

The development of bidirectional rotor blades with mirrored leading and trailing edges and fixed pitch, allowing for efficient operation in both forward and reverse directions by varying RPM and rotational direction through a clutch or dedicated electric motor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional unidirectional rotor blades are used, then the rotor is optimized for single-direction lift generation, but the rotor becomes inefficient when reversing direction and requires complex pitch control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor efficiencyVSAvoidpitch control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor blade employs asymmetric airfoil geometry with maximum thickness positioned at 30% of the chord length from the leading edge, creating camber optimized for unidirectional lift generation. This asymmetric configuration eliminates the need for complex pitch control mechanisms while maintaining high efficiency in the primary direction of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex pitch control mechanisms to adjust blade angle for direction reversal, the invention inverts the approach by using fixed asymmetric blades combined with variable RPM control and rotational direction reversal to achieve the same effect, thereby simplifying the mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If rotor blades with maximum thickness offset closer to leading edge are used, then lift generation is optimized, but the chord length and inertia increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelift generationVSAvoidchord length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor blade design specifies maximum thickness positioned at exactly 30% of the chord length from the leading edge, representing an optimized parameter that balances lift generation efficiency with reduced chord length and inertia compared to conventional 33% positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The asymmetric airfoil geometry with predetermined maximum thickness positioning is designed in advance to pre-optimize the balance between lift generation and inertia, eliminating the need for runtime adjustments and reducing overall blade dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If conventional rotor blades with fixed pitch are used, then the structure is simplified, but the ability to control lift in varying directions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade structureVSAvoiddirectional control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static pitch control to dynamic control by enabling variable RPM and rotational direction of fixed-pitch asymmetric blades, allowing the rotor to adapt to varying flight conditions and directional requirements without changing blade geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The fixed-pitch asymmetric blade design performs multiple functions: it generates optimized lift in the primary direction, enables efficient direction reversal through RPM and rotational direction control, and simplifies the overall structure, making the rotor system universally applicable to various flight maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables quicker and more efficient yaw control and improved responsiveness during flight by providing thrust in both directions with reduced chord length and inertia, enhancing rotorcraft maneuverability.

Implementation Method 1

bidirectional aircraft rotor blades configured for producing a yaw moment of a selected magnitude and a selective direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentEP3647191B1Bidirectional aircraft rotor
Publication Date: 2021.04.14 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC
  • EP3647191B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3647191B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3647191B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A bidirectional aircraft rotor for a rotorcraft tail rotor (301). The rotorcraft tail rotor uses a hub (121) and a first tail rotor blade (423) affixed to the hub (121). A pitch of the first tail rotor blade (423) is fixed, and a profile of a leading edge (203, 303) of the first tail rotor blade (423) is identical to a profile of a trailing edge (205, 305) of the first tail rotor blade (423). The tail rotor is driven by a torque source, such as an electric motor or an engine. The tail rotor uses variable RPM and reversible rotational direction to provide rotorcraft with yaw control.