Bidirectional Torque Limiter With Asymmetric Slip Torque

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bidirectional torque limiters set the same slip torque for both directions of rotation, making it difficult to achieve a smaller slip torque when inputting rotation from the driving part compared to the driven part.

Innovation Solution

The bidirectional torque limiter is designed with an external coil spring that clamps the outer race with a relatively small force and an internal coil spring that clamps the inner race with a larger force, allowing the external coil spring to slip when a rotation torque is applied from the driving part and the internal coil spring to slip when a torque is applied from the driven part.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single coil spring is used to clamp the race, then the structure is simple, but the slip torque is the same in both rotation directions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoiddifferent slip torque in different directions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The single coil spring is segmented into two separate coil springs: an external coil spring for clamping the outer race and an internal coil spring for clamping the inner race. This segmentation allows each spring to be independently configured with different clamping forces, enabling different slip torques in different rotation directions while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different clamping forces are applied at different locations: the external coil spring applies a first clamping force to the outer race, while the internal coil spring applies a second clamping force to the inner race. This local differentiation of clamping forces enables the torque limiter to have different slip characteristics in different rotation directions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the external coil spring clamping force is increased, then the slip torque from driving part is increased, but it becomes larger than desired for efficient operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque transmission reliabilityVSAvoidefficient operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping force parameter of the external coil spring is specifically adjusted to be relatively small compared to the internal coil spring. This parameter change enables the slip torque when rotation is input from the driving part to be smaller, allowing efficient operation while still providing reliable torque transmission when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the internal coil spring clamping force is decreased, then the slip torque from driven part is decreased, but it becomes smaller than desired for reliable torque transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation efficiencyVSAvoidtorque transmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping force parameter of the internal coil spring is specifically adjusted to be relatively large compared to the external coil spring. This parameter change ensures that the slip torque when rotation is input from the driven part is larger, providing reliable torque transmission while allowing efficient operation in the opposite direction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for a smaller slip torque when rotation is input from the driving part and a larger slip torque when rotation is input from the driven part, enabling efficient operation and reliable torque transmission in both directions.

Implementation Method 1

an external coil spring (42) is mounted on the outer peripheral surface of the outer race (8), the external coil spring in a free state has an inner diameter smaller than the outer diameter of the outer race (8), and the external coil spring clamps the outer race with a relatively small clamping force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

an internal coil spring (48) is mounted on the outer peripheral surface of the inner race (10), the internal coil spring in a free state has an inner diameter smaller than the outer diameter of the inner race (10), and the internal coil spring clamps the inner race with a relatively large clamping force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

In a case where the rotation torque is smaller than the first predetermined torque, the auxiliary member and the housing rotate integrally, namely, the rotation torque is transmitted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP4030074B1Bidirectional torque limiter
Publication Date: 2024.08.07 ORIGIN CO LTD(JP)
  • EP4030074B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4030074B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4030074B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Provided is a novel bidirectional torque limiter, which allows setting a slip torque for a case of inputting rotation from a driving part to be smaller than a slip torque for a case of inputting rotation from a driven part. The force of an external coil spring 42 to clamp an outer race 8 is set smaller than the force of an internal coil spring 48 to clamp an inner race 10, so that the external coil spring 42 increases its diameter to slip with respect to the outer race 8 when a rotation torque is applied from the driving part, while the internal coil spring 48 increases its diameter to slip with respect to the inner race 10 when a rotation torque is applied from the driven part.