BIER Route Notification Across ASBR Groups Using BFR Group Prefixes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In existing Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) networks, the presence of multiple pairs of Autonomous System Border Routers (ASBRs) between autonomous systems increases BIER route calculation complexity due to treating network reachability information from different ASBRs as independent unicast routes, affecting subsequent packet forwarding.

Innovation Solution

A method where ASBRs within an autonomous system are grouped together and configured with a common BFR group prefix, allowing them to notify a unified BIER route using a BIER Path Attribute, reducing the complexity by treating multiple routes as a single optimized route.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple pairs of ASBRs between autonomous systems treat network reachability information from different ASBRs as independent unicast routes, then route diversity is maintained, but BIER route calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute diversityVSAvoidBIER route calculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent unicast routes from different ASBRs into a single unified BIER route. Multiple ASBRs within an autonomous system are grouped together and configured with a common BFR group prefix, allowing them to notify a unified BIER route using a BIER Path Attribute. This consolidation reduces the number of separate route calculations while maintaining the diversity of available paths through the grouped ASBRs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Device complexity

If multiple ASBRs are grouped with a common BFR group prefix to notify a unified BIER route, then route calculation complexity is reduced, but the granularity of individual route control is decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute calculation complexityVSAvoidindividual route control granularity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the ASBRs into groups based on their autonomous system membership, with each group assigned a common BFR group prefix. This segmentation allows for unified route notification at the group level while maintaining the ability to control routing at the individual ASBR level through the BIER Path Attribute mechanism. The grouping is logical and can be configured independently of physical topology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If ASBRs notify unified BIER routes using BIER Path Attribute, then packet forwarding efficiency is improved, but the requirement for BIER capability in ASBRs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket forwarding efficiencyVSAvoidBIER capability requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the BIER Path Attribute mechanism universal by enabling any ASBR within a BIER-capable autonomous system to participate in unified route notification. The common BFR group prefix configuration allows multiple ASBRs to work together using the same BIER capabilities, creating a multi-functional routing mechanism that can be deployed across existing BIER networks without requiring completely new infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12452163B2Route notifying methods and electronic devices
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 NEW H3C TECH CO LTD
  • US12452163B2 patent drawing
  • US12452163B2 patent drawing
  • US12452163B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides route notifying methods and electronic devices. In this embodiment, respective ASBRs connected with a second AS in a first AS notify network reachability information (carrying a BIER Path Attribute, where the BIER Path Attribute at least includes BFR IDs of respective BFRs in the first AS) corresponding to a same BFR group prefix to the second AS; when receiving the network reachability information notified by the ASBR in the first AS, the ASBR in the second AS continues to notify a BIER route of the same BFR group prefix in the first AS in the second AS (carrying the BFR IDs of respective BFRs in the first AS).