Bifunctional Catalyst for Hydrocracking Lube Base Stocks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing lube base stock through hydrocracking are costly and inefficient, requiring separate steps like hydroisomerization and dewaxing, especially due to the need for noble metal catalysts like platinum or palladium to reduce the pour point of unconverted oil.

Innovation Solution

A hydrocracking process that combines molecular weight reduction and hydroisomerization of heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks using a specific catalyst composition and operating conditions, eliminating the need for separate hydroisomerization and dewaxing steps by achieving pour point reduction within the hydrocracking reactor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If separate hydroisomerization and dewaxing steps are used to reduce pour point, then lube base stock quality is improved, but production cost and process complexity increase due to noble metal catalyst requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelube base stock qualityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines hydrocracking and hydroisomerization functions into a single reactor system using a bifunctional catalyst. The catalyst contains both cracking functionality (to break down heavy hydrocarbons) and isomerization functionality (to reduce pour point), eliminating the need for separate hydroisomerization and dewaxing units and their associated noble metal catalysts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrocracking catalyst is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it conducts hydrocracking to reduce molecular weight and also performs hydroisomerization to convert normal paraffins to isoparaffins, thereby reducing pour point. This multi-functional catalyst replaces what would traditionally require separate catalysts and reaction zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple catalytic conversion steps are implemented, then lube base stock properties are enhanced, but production cost increases due to additional catalysts and equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelube base stock propertiesVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple catalytic conversion steps (hydrocracking, hydroisomerization, and dewaxing) into a single reaction zone using a specially designed bifunctional catalyst. This consolidation eliminates the need for multiple separate catalyst beds, reactors, and associated equipment, thereby reducing capital expenditure and operational costs while maintaining product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The catalyst system is designed with universal functionality to perform multiple conversion tasks in one pass: cracking heavy molecules, isomerizing paraffins to reduce pour point, and removing impurities. This single catalyst system replaces what would traditionally require sequential use of multiple different catalysts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If unconverted oil is recycled to improve hydrocracking conversion, then overall conversion efficiency is improved, but pour point reduction is insufficient without additional treatment steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrocracking conversionVSAvoidpour point reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines hydrocracking and hydroisomerization in a single reaction zone, allowing unconverted oil to be recycled and reprocessed through the same catalyst bed. The bifunctional catalyst ensures that each pass through the reactor simultaneously achieves cracking conversion and pour point reduction, making the recycling loop effective for both objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous recycling of unconverted oil through the hydrocracking-reactor ensures that the bifunctional catalyst continuously performs both cracking and isomerization functions. This continuous action on the recycle stream progressively reduces molecular weight and pour point until the product meets specification, maximizing conversion efficiency while achieving the desired pour point reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process produces lube base stocks that meet API Group II and Group III specifications without the need for additional catalysts, reducing production costs and improving operating efficiencies by directly utilizing the hydrocracker effluent as a valuable lube base stock.

Implementation Method 1

Hydrocracking is generally accomplished by contacting, in a hydrocracking reactor or reaction zone, the gas oil or other feedstock to be treated with a suitable hydrocracking catalyst under conditions of elevated temperature and pressure. Hydrocracking reactions reduce the overall molecular weight of the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic cracking: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

In particular, heteroatomic contaminants and particularly sulfur and nitrogen compounds are removed, aromatic compounds are hydrogenated to their corresponding saturated cyclic compounds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodemetallation: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

Hydroisomerization converts normal paraffins to isoparaffins, while dewaxing reduces paraffin molecular weight, with both of these catalytic processes beneficially reducing the pour point of the unconverted oil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic isomerization: Catalysis

Implementation Method 4

dewaxing reduces paraffin molecular weight, with both of these catalytic processes beneficially reducing the pour point of the unconverted oil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic cracking: Catalysis

Implementation Method 5

Following such reactions to lower the pour point, a hydrofinishing step may then be used to further hydrogenate remaining unsaturated hydrocarbons and remove sulfur and nitrogen, thereby improving the lube base stock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentUS8231778B2Hydrocracking processes yielding a hydroisomerized product for lube base stocks
Publication Date: 2012.07.31 UOP LLC
  • US8231778B2 patent drawing
  • US8231778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods are disclosed for hydrocracking processes that convert a significant portion of a heavy hydrocarbon feedstock such as vacuum gas oil (VGO) to lower molecular weight, lower boiling hydrocarbons. In addition to molecular weight reduction, the processes also substantially reduce the pour point of a recovered higher boiling fraction or unconverted oil, all or a portion of which may be used as a lube base stock, optionally after one or more further treatment steps such as hydrofinishing. The ability to reduce the pour point, through hydroisomerization, of the higher boiling fraction greatly improves the quality of this fraction, or unconverted oil, for use in lube base stock preparation. Advantageously, separate, conventional hydroisomerization and/or dewaxing steps, often requiring a noble metal catalyst, may be avoided in particular embodiments disclosed herein.