Bifurcated AI Model for Dynamic Processing Pathway Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine learning models face challenges in practical applications due to bias from low-quality training data and poorly fitted model parameters, especially in data-sparse environments, and conventional algorithms struggle with dynamic systems where node availability, distance, and location change.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a bifurcated model to generate synthetic sets of processing increments, using multiple AI models to identify potential increments and determine optimal pathways in dynamic systems by analyzing co-occurrence matrices, allowing for recommendations on processing pathways in changing environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional shortest-path algorithms are used to calculate processing pathways, then the approach is simple and works well in static environments, but it fails in dynamic systems where node availability, distance, and location change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamic systemsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static shortest-path algorithms to a dynamic AI-based system that continuously adapts to changing node availability, distance, and location. The AI model processes real-time system state information and generates optimal processing pathways dynamically, allowing the system to respond to environmental changes without requiring complete re-computation of all possible paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses synthetic data generation to create virtual copies of processing pathways and system states. By generating synthetic training data that mirrors real dynamic system behavior, the AI model can learn optimal pathways without directly manipulating the complex real-time system, thus reducing computational complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to improve processing pathways, then speed and accuracy of determinations increase, but bias from low-quality training data and poorly fitted parameters occurs especially in data-sparse environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracyVSAvoidmodel reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the AI model continuously receives feedback about the quality and relevance of training data. In data-sparse environments, the system identifies gaps in training data quality and actively seeks or generates additional synthetic data to improve model parameters, thereby maintaining high determination accuracy while improving reliability through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts model parameters based on the quality and quantity of available training data. When operating in data-sparse environments, the system changes parameters such as weighting factors, threshold values, and data sampling strategies to optimize model performance. This adaptive parameter adjustment maintains determination accuracy while improving reliability by preventing overfitting to limited or biased data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If all available processing increments are used to generate synthetic subsets, then comprehensive coverage is achieved, but computational time and resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of processing incrementsVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive set of processing increments into manageable subsets based on criteria such as relevance, importance, and computational cost. By dividing the large dataset into smaller, more manageable segments that can be processed in parallel or sequentially, the system achieves comprehensive coverage of critical processing increments while significantly reducing total computational time and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selectively processing only the most relevant and impactful processing increments rather than exhaustively analyzing all available increments. The AI model identifies and prioritizes a subset of critical increments that provide sufficient coverage for optimal pathway generation, avoiding the computational burden of processing every single increment while maintaining adequate completeness for reliable decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240193465A1Systems and methods for generating improved process management using a bifurcated model to generate synthetic sets of processing steps
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 DEVGUILD LLC
  • US20240193465A1 patent drawing
  • US20240193465A1 patent drawing
  • US20240193465A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described herein for improvements to generating improved processing pathway management and determining optimal processing increments to complete the processing pathway using synthetic subsets of processing increments. For example, systems and methods are described herein for generating synthetic subsets of processing increments using models and algorithms.