Big-Bag Shredding for Polyethylene-Polypropylene Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current recycling methods for large flexible big-bags, composed of polyethylene and polypropylene, fail to effectively separate these materials after shredding, resulting in contaminated and low-quality recycled products due to chemical incompatibility and inefficient shredding technologies.

Innovation Solution

A method involving compacting big-bags to less than 20 cm, shredding with a high cutting frequency to produce distinct morphologies of polyethylene strips and polypropylene fragments, followed by separation, cleaning, and extrusion to produce pure polypropylene and polyethylene granules, utilizing a shredding facility with a conveyor belt and shaker for efficient separation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If big-bags are completely shredded by machines, then shredding efficiency is improved, but separation effectiveness of polyethylene and polypropylene deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshredding efficiencyVSAvoidseparation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shredding process is segmented into multiple stages with different cutting frequencies. A first shredding stage uses a first cutting frequency to produce initial shreds, while a second shredding stage uses a second cutting frequency (different from the first) to produce final shredded material with distinct morphologies. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high productivity while achieving effective separation of polyethylene and polypropylene components through controlled morphological differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If manual separation of internal bag and external outer is performed, then separation effectiveness is improved, but processing time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation effectivenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical separation process is replaced with an automated shredding and separation system. The system uses controlled shredding with specific cutting frequencies to automatically differentiate polyethylene and polypropylene morphologies, followed by automated separation mechanisms. This substitution eliminates manual labor while maintaining effective separation, significantly reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If current shredding technologies are used, then shredding speed is improved, but morphological differentiation of components deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshredding speedVSAvoidmorphological differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The shredding system dynamically adjusts cutting frequencies between different shredding stages. The first shredding stage operates at a first cutting frequency optimized for initial size reduction, while the second shredding stage operates at a second cutting frequency optimized for morphological differentiation. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain high shredding speed while achieving the shape differentiation necessary for effective component separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves effective separation and recycling of polyethylene and polypropylene, producing granules with improved physical characteristics suitable for industrial reuse, reducing contamination and enhancing recycling efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a shaker able to separate a first fraction of polypropylene fragments from a second fraction of polyethylene strips

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

separation of the two plastic materials, PP and PE, respectively constituting the external outer and the internal bag of the big-bag

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational settling: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

A first extruder is fed with said first cleaned fraction of polypropylene fragments in order to obtain polypropylene granules and a second extruder is fed with said second cleaned fraction of shredded polyethylene strips in order to obtain polyethylene granules

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 4

compacting and then melting, mixing and single-screw extrusion between 240° and 260° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS20240359366A1Method for shredding and recycling used big-bags and facility for implementing the method
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 ALL SUN SRL

AI summary

The method for shredding and recycling used big-bags, having a continuous internal bag of polyethylene and an external outer of polypropylene, includes: compacting at least one big-bag to a thickness of less than 20 cm; conveying the compacted big-bag(s) to a shredding unit; shredding at least one compacted big-bag at the shredding unit, between 100 and 1000 cuts/m being performed on the compacted big-bag(s) to obtain strips of the PE outer and fragments of the PP outer; separating the PE strips from the PP fragments to obtain a first fraction of PP fragments and a second fraction of PE strips: applying a second shredding of the polyethylene strips; cleaning the two fractions; feeding first and second extruders respectively with the cleaned first fraction to obtain PP granules and with the cleaned second fraction to obtain PE granules.