Big Data Machine Learning System Model Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current modeling methods, such as data modeling and simulation modeling, face limitations in accurately predicting system behavior when system configurations or rules change, and struggle with handling unexpected events due to the reliance on prior knowledge and data availability.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that integrates big data machine learning by using verified parameter values from machine learning on real-world data to build a system model, combining domain knowledge with machine learning algorithms to create a hypothetical model that can adapt to changes and predict system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a machine learning-based model is built using big data, then prediction capability is improved, but the model cannot adapt when system configuration or operating rules change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to system changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic modeling approach where the system model automatically adapts to changing conditions by continuously learning from new operational data. The model transitions from a static structure to a dynamic one that can adjust its parameters and behavior based on real-time system state changes, enabling it to maintain prediction accuracy despite configuration modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors actual system behavior, compares it with model predictions, and uses the discrepancies to refine and update the model. This closed-loop feedback allows the model to learn from actual system responses and adapt to changing operating rules, resolving the contradiction between initial prediction accuracy and long-term adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If data modeling method is used to represent correlation between datasets, then prediction can be made assuming system operates without change, but the method cannot handle sudden or changing situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction speedVSAvoidhandling of changing situations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static data modeling approach into a dynamic system that continuously updates its understanding of system behavior. By incorporating real-time data streaming and adaptive learning algorithms, the model maintains the speed of data-driven predictions while gaining the flexibility to handle sudden changes and evolving system conditions that static correlation models cannot accommodate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If simulation modeling based on physical laws is used, then causal relationship can be expressed, but detailed system information must be available and model validation is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecausal relationship representationVSAvoidmodel validation process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the strengths of both simulation modeling (causal relationship representation) and data-driven modeling (adaptive learning) into a hybrid approach. The system combines physical law-based causal models with machine learning algorithms that learn from actual operational data, allowing the model to maintain causal interpretability while automatically validating and refining itself through real-world observations, thereby reducing the manual validation burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If big data machine learning is applied to verify parameter values, then model reliability is improved, but computational resources and processing time are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter value verificationVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial machine learning verification rather than exhaustive validation of all parameters. The system selectively applies ML algorithms to verify only the most critical or uncertain parameters, using computational resources efficiently by focusing verification efforts where they provide the most value. This partial action approach maintains reliability improvement while significantly reducing overall computational consumption compared to comprehensive verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240428128A1Computing system for implementing system model using big data machine learning
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 KOREA DIGITAL TWIN LAB INC
  • US20240428128A1 patent drawing
  • US20240428128A1 patent drawing
  • US20240428128A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a computing system for implementing a system model using big data machine learning, which is intended to build a hypothetical model, calculate verified parameter values by performing machine learning on big data acquired from an actual system, and apply the verified parameter values to the hypothetical model. A system modeling method of completing a simulation model for a target system by causing a hypothetical model defined by acquiring knowledge about the target system to perform machine learning on big data acquired by running and observing the target system includes defining a hypothetical model for a target system by finding acquirable information related to the target system.