Bilateral Electrical Stimulation for Bladder Dysfunction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for bladder dysfunction, such as overactive bladder and urinary incontinence, often fail to provide effective and sustained relief due to neuron habituation and adaptation, leading to reduced therapeutic efficacy over time.

Innovation Solution

A bilateral electrical stimulation therapy system that delivers first and second stimulation therapies, where the first therapy involves alternating stimulation to lateral sides of the bladder at different times, and the second therapy involves simultaneous bilateral stimulation to elicit a stronger inhibitory physiological response, reducing bladder contractions and preventing involuntary voiding events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional electrical stimulation therapy is delivered continuously to treat bladder dysfunction, then initial therapeutic effect is achieved, but neuron habituation and adaptation occur over time leading to reduced efficacy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidduration of therapeutic effect
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by alternating between bilateral stimulation (both lateral sides simultaneously) and unilateral stimulation (one lateral side at a time) in a cyclical manner. This periodic alternation prevents continuous identical stimulation patterns that cause neuron habituation, thereby maintaining therapeutic efficacy over extended periods. The system switches between different stimulation modes to keep neurons responsive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the stimulation therapy adaptive and variable rather than static. The system dynamically adjusts between bilateral and unilateral stimulation modes based on programmed protocols, creating varying stimulation patterns that prevent neural adaptation. This dynamic approach allows the therapy to evolve over time, maintaining effectiveness despite prolonged use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If bilateral stimulation is delivered to both lateral sides simultaneously, then stronger inhibitory physiological response is elicited, but neuron adaptation occurs more rapidly reducing long-term benefit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinhibitory physiological response strengthVSAvoidduration of therapeutic benefit
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic action to alternate between strong bilateral stimulation and unilateral stimulation. By cycling between these modes, the system maintains strong inhibitory responses when needed while preventing rapid adaptation through variation. The periodic switching ensures that neurons do not habituate to a single persistent pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the bilateral stimulation into alternating phases of bilateral and unilateral delivery. Rather than continuous bilateral stimulation, the therapy is divided into segments where unilateral stimulation provides relief from adaptation while bilateral stimulation delivers strong inhibitory effects, creating a segmented approach that balances intensity and duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Duration of action of stationary object

If alternating stimulation is delivered to lateral sides at different times, then neuron adaptation is reduced extending therapeutic benefit, but inhibitory physiological response strength is decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduration of therapeutic benefitVSAvoidinhibitory physiological response strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by rhythmically alternating between bilateral and unilateral stimulation modes. This periodic variation maintains neuron responsiveness over time (extending duration) while periodically delivering strong bilateral stimulation to maintain inhibitory response strength. The rhythm ensures both goals are achieved at different phases of the cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges bilateral and unilateral stimulation approaches into a single integrated therapy protocol. Rather than choosing one or the other, the system combines both modes in an alternating sequence, allowing the therapeutic benefits of reduced adaptation (from unilateral) and strong inhibitory response (from bilateral) to work together in complementarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively manages bladder dysfunction by reducing bladder contraction frequency and preventing involuntary voiding through alternating and simultaneous stimulation techniques, thereby extending the therapeutic benefit and reducing neuron adaptation.

Implementation Method 1

A stimulation generator is configured to generate and deliver electrical stimulation to a patient

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation:

Data Source

PatentUS8706232B2Bilateral electrical stimulation therapy for bladder dysfunction
Publication Date: 2014.04.22 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US8706232B2 patent drawing
  • US8706232B2 patent drawing
  • US8706232B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical device is configured to deliver a first stimulation therapy to a patient, and, upon detecting a trigger event, deliver a second stimulation therapy to the patient. In some examples, the first stimulation therapy includes bilateral stimulation in which stimulation is delivered at different times to two lateral sides of the patient and the second stimulation therapy includes substantially simultaneous bilateral stimulation therapy to two lateral sides of the patient. In some examples, the second stimulation therapy may elicit a stronger inhibitory physiological response related to incontinence (e.g., inhibition of bladder contractions) than the first stimulation therapy. The trigger event may include, for example, any one or more of detection of a physiological condition indicative of an increased possibility of an involuntary voiding event or an imminent involuntary voiding event, input from the patient, a predetermined time of day, or expiration of a timer.