Bilayer Photonic Adiabatic Splitter for Low-Loss Coupling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional adiabatic splitters face challenges in achieving minimal loss, compactness, and precise split ratios while maintaining fabrication tolerance and optical performance.

Innovation Solution

The adiabatic splitter design incorporates a first waveguide and a second waveguide with a stacked layer arrangement, allowing for a refractive index differential that prevents light scattering, enabling the waveguides to converge rapidly and facilitating a precise 50:50 split ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional adiabatic splitters are used, then basic splitting function is achieved, but optical loss is high and compactness is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical lossVSAvoidwaveguide structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The second waveguide is segmented into two distinct layers (first layer and second layer) with different refractive indices. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each layer's contribution to the adiabatic coupling process, enabling reduced optical loss while maintaining compact dimensions through selective engagement of layers during the coupling stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The waveguide structure employs composite material design by combining multiple layers with different refractive indices (first layer with lower refractive index, second layer with higher refractive index). This composite structure creates a differential refractive index profile that enhances adiabatic coupling efficiency, reducing optical loss without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Volume of moving object

If waveguides converge rapidly to achieve compactness, then device size is reduced, but split ratio precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice footprintVSAvoidsplit ratio precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the waveguide structure are assigned different refractive indices through the layered configuration. The first layer and second layer have distinct refractive indices that create localized optical field distributions. This local quality differentiation enables precise control of the coupling coefficient along the interaction length, maintaining split ratio precision (50:50) even as the overall device footprint is reduced through rapid convergence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in the refractive index profile by introducing a second layer with a different refractive index than the first layer. This parameter variation allows tuning of the adiabatic coupling conditions, enabling precise split ratio control while accommodating compact waveguide geometries where the waveguides converge rapidly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If stacked layer arrangement is used to prevent light scattering, then optical performance is improved, but fabrication complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical performanceVSAvoidfabrication tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a single-layer waveguide structure to a multi-layer stacked arrangement by adding a vertical dimension to the waveguide composition. The first layer and second layer are positioned in stacked configuration, utilizing the vertical dimension to create refractive index differential that prevents light scattering. This dimensional addition improves optical performance while the layered architecture remains compatible with standard fabrication processes through planar processing techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves improved optical performance, packaging, and manufacturability by minimizing light loss, reducing material usage, and ensuring precise splitting ratios, making it suitable for advanced applications like Co-Packaged Optics.

Implementation Method 1

the first and second layers are in a stacked arrangement... allowing for a refractive index differential that prevents light scattering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefractive index differential: Refraction

Data Source

PatentUS20250155639A1Bilayer photonic adiabatic 2x2 splitter
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250155639A1 patent drawing
  • US20250155639A1 patent drawing
  • US20250155639A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Adiabatic splitters are disclosed. In one aspect, an adiabatic splitter includes a first waveguide and a second waveguide spaced from the first waveguide by a gap. The second waveguide has a first layer and a second layer. In a first stage of the adiabatic splitter, the first and second waveguides converge toward one another and the first and second layers are in a stacked arrangement. In a second stage of the adiabatic splitter, the second layer tapers and translates so that the first and second layers are no longer in the stacked arrangement at least at an output of the adiabatic splitter.