Bill Aggregation Service Automates Payment Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bill payment systems are inconvenient and prone to errors, requiring individuals and organizations to manually track and schedule payments, which can lead to missed payments, late fees, and negative impacts on credit ratings.

Innovation Solution

A system that aggregates payments over a given period, allowing users to make a single payment to cover all bills, determines due amounts and dates without user input, and provides consolidated statements for tracking and reporting, using a computer system to interact with billing entities and financial institutions for automated payments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual bill tracking and payment scheduling is used, then users maintain control over individual payments, but users experience significant time consumption, stress, and risk of missed payments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of bill paymentVSAvoidtime for tracking bills
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically tracking bills, calculating amounts due, determining due dates, and executing payments without requiring user intervention. The bill aggregation service autonomously manages the entire payment process, from receiving billing information to making payments, thereby eliminating the time-consuming manual tracking while maintaining payment control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a bill aggregation service as an intermediary between users and multiple billing entities. This intermediary consolidates billing information from various sources, manages payment scheduling, and executes payments on behalf of users. The intermediary handles the complexity of tracking multiple bills across different entities, freeing users from direct involvement in the tedious tracking process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If individual bill payments are scheduled manually, then users can control each payment, but the complexity of tracking multiple bills and due dates increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of payment trackingVSAvoidcomplexity of bill tracking system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual bill tracking functions into a single consolidated bill aggregation service. Instead of requiring separate tracking systems for each billing entity, the service consolidates all billing information, amounts due, and due dates into one unified system. This merging reduces the perceived complexity for users while maintaining comprehensive payment control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The bill aggregation service performs multiple functions within a single system: it tracks billing information from various entities, calculates consolidated amounts due, determines due dates, generates consolidated statements, and executes payments. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate tools for each task, reducing overall system complexity from the user's perspective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If consolidated bill payment service is implemented, then user effort and stress are reduced, but the system complexity and automation requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of bill paymentVSAvoidcomplexity of automated system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bill aggregation service acts as an intermediary layer between users and the complex automated payment infrastructure. It handles the complexity of integrating with multiple billing entities, managing payment schedules, and coordinating transfers, while presenting a simplified interface to users. The intermediary absorbs the system complexity, allowing high productivity without requiring users to manage the underlying complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by generating consolidated statements that inform users of payments to be made and providing post-payment reporting. This feedback loop ensures users remain informed and can verify the automated system's actions, building trust in the complex automated process while maintaining high efficiency. The feedback also allows users to correct any errors in the automated tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10679196B2Bill payment aggregation service
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 WESTERN UNION CO
  • US10679196B2 patent drawing
  • US10679196B2 patent drawing
  • US10679196B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Tools for providing bill aggregation and/or payment services. In an aspect, such tools aggregate all payments over a given period of time, allowing a user to make a single payment to ensure that all appropriate bills are paid in timely fashion. In another aspect, the tools determine, without requiring user input, an amount due on each bill, as well, in some cases, of a due date for each payment. Optionally, the tools can provide a consolidated statement to inform the user of payments to be made over a given period. Such statements can provide a varying level of detail, depending on the implementation and/or on user preferences. In some cases, a consolidated statement might provide line items and/or detailed support for each payment to be made. In other cases, the consolidated statement might simply provide a single consolidated payment amount.