Bimetallic Organometallic Emitters for Stable Blue OLED Emission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current organic light-emitting devices face limitations in achieving high luminescence efficiency and stability, particularly in blue light emission, due to issues with excimer formation and phosphorescence efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A novel organometallic compound with a bimetallic complex structure, represented by Formula 1, is introduced, which features a borane-based moiety and a dual ligand structure that suppresses excimer formation and enhances luminescence efficiency through thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) and phosphorescence, while providing a rigid structure for improved device stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional organic light-emitting devices are used, then device structure is simple, but luminescence efficiency is low and stability is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structure simplicityVSAvoidluminescence efficiency and stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a bimetallic complex structure combining two metal centers (M1 and M2) with different ligands (L1-L6) to create a composite material that synergistically improves luminescence efficiency and stability. The dual metal center system allows for optimized electronic properties while maintaining structural integrity, directly addressing the contradiction between simple structure and high performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies molecular parameters by introducing specific ligand structures (L1-L6 with various substituents R1-R11) and metal center combinations to tune the luminescence properties. By changing the chemical composition and molecular structure parameters, the device achieves enhanced efficiency and stability without overly complicating the overall device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If excimer formation is allowed to occur, then device structure is simple, but blue light emission efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolecular structure simplicityVSAvoidblue light emission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by designing the bimetallic complex structure with specific steric hindrance and electronic properties that prevent excimer formation before it can occur. The ligand framework (L1-L6) is engineered to maintain molecular separation and prevent the aggregation that leads to excimer formation, thereby preserving blue light emission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces local quality differences by creating a rigid molecular framework with specific ligand arrangements around the metal centers. This local structural differentiation prevents uniform aggregation while maintaining overall molecular simplicity, effectively suppressing excimer formation in the blue-emitting regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If phosphorescence efficiency is not enhanced, then device structure is simple, but luminescence efficiency and lifespan are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompound structure simplicityVSAvoidluminescence efficiency and device lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a bimetallic composite structure where two different metal centers (M1 and M2) with complementary properties work synergistically to enhance phosphorescence efficiency. This composite approach allows for optimized spin-orbit coupling and triplet state management, improving luminescence efficiency and device lifespan while maintaining reasonable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The bimetallic complex structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides structural stability, enhances phosphorescence efficiency, enables blue light emission, and prevents excimer formation. This multi-functionality is achieved within a unified molecular framework, avoiding the need for multiple separate components that would increase device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If rigid structure is introduced for stability, then device stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice stabilityVSAvoidmolecular structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves device stability through a bimetallic composite structure where the coordinated ligands (L1-L6) create a rigid framework around the metal centers. This composite approach distributes structural rigidity across multiple coordination bonds and ligand-metal interactions, providing stability without requiring an overly complex single-molecule structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the molecular structure into distinct functional components: metal centers (M1, M2), ligands (L1-L6), and substituent groups (R1-R11). This segmentation allows each component to contribute specifically to stability while maintaining overall structural organization, preventing the need for a monolithic complex structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The organometallic compound exhibits excellent luminescence characteristics with high efficiency and long lifespan, effectively addressing the limitations of existing devices by enhancing blue light emission and overall device durability.

Implementation Method 1

enhances luminescence efficiency through thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) and phosphorescence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF): Fluorescence

Implementation Method 2

enhances luminescence efficiency through thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) and phosphorescence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhosphorescence: Phosphorescence

Implementation Method 3

Organic light-emitting devices are self-emission devices that produce full-color images

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroluminescence: Electroluminescence

Data Source

PatentUS11793067B2Organometallic compound and organic light-emitting device including the same
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US11793067B2 patent drawing
  • US11793067B2 patent drawing
  • US11793067B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An organic light-emitting device includes: a first electrode; a second electrode; an organic layer between the first electrode and the second electrode and including an emission layer; and at least one organometallic compound represented by Formula 1. The organic light-emitting device including the organometallic compound may have a low driving voltage, a high luminance, a high efficiency, and a long lifespan: