Bi-Metallic Magnetron Anode Structure for Eddy Current and Cooling Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional RF sources for modern intensity-frontier superconducting pulsed accelerators are expensive and inefficient, and existing magnetron anode designs suffer from high eddy currents and inadequate cooling, which hinder effective amplitude modulation and power control for RF sources.

Innovation Solution

A bi-metallic anode structure is developed using a stainless steel outer layer and a copper inner layer, with the copper used for low-resistivity tips and water cooling channels, and coated with copper to minimize eddy currents and enhance heat transfer, fabricated through explosion bonding for secure bonding and efficient cooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a traditional single-material anode structure is used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but eddy currents are high and cooling efficiency is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanode manufacturing simplicityVSAvoideddy current losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining copper and stainless steel in a bi-metallic anode structure. The copper layer (with lower resistivity) is positioned at the vane tips where eddy currents are generated, while the stainless steel provides structural support. This composite structure reduces eddy current losses by approximately 50% compared to traditional single-material anodes, directly resolving the technical contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and energy loss reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If a traditional single-material anode structure is used, then the structure is simple, but cooling efficiency is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanode structure complexityVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The bi-metallic anode combines copper's superior thermal conductivity with stainless steel's structural properties. The copper layer efficiently conducts heat away from the vane tips where RF heating occurs, while the stainless steel provides mechanical strength. This composite approach improves cooling efficiency without requiring complex external cooling systems, resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and thermal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Loss of energy

If copper is used for the entire anode, then eddy currents are reduced, but structural strength and cooling channel integration are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeddy current lossesVSAvoidanode structural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by positioning copper specifically at the vane tips where eddy currents are generated and cooling is most needed, while using stainless steel for the bulk structure where mechanical strength is critical. This localized material distribution optimizes both electrical performance (reducing eddy currents) and mechanical performance (maintaining structural strength), resolving the technical contradiction between energy loss reduction and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If stainless steel is used for the entire anode, then structural strength is maintained, but eddy currents and heat transfer are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanode structural strengthVSAvoideddy current losses
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The bi-metallic anode combines stainless steel's structural strength with copper's electrical and thermal properties. The copper layer is bonded to the stainless steel substrate, creating a composite structure that simultaneously achieves low eddy current losses (due to copper's lower resistivity) and high structural strength (due to stainless steel's mechanical properties), resolving the contradiction between maintaining strength and reducing energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The bi-metallic anode structure reduces eddy currents, improves cooling efficiency, and enables effective amplitude modulation and power control for magnetrons, enhancing the stability and efficiency of RF sources for superconducting pulsed accelerators.

Implementation Method 1

The second metal has a resistivity lower than first metal and a thermal conductivity higher than the first metal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

formed by explosion bonding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExplosion bonding: Explosive Welding

Implementation Method 3

The bi-metallic anode structure reduces eddy currents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentUS11961692B2Bi-metallic anode for amplitude modulated magnetron
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 MUONS INC
  • US11961692B2 patent drawing
  • US11961692B2 patent drawing
  • US11961692B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An anode structure for a magnetron provides for low eddy currents and efficient water cooling. The anode structure may be made by machining a bimetal blank including an out layer of a first metal and an inner layer of a second metal and formed by explosion bonding. The second metal has a resistivity lower than first metal and a thermal conductivity higher than the first metal. The machining may result in the anode structure with vanes each having a center (tip) portion made of the second metal and the rest made of the first metal. The machined anode structure may be coated with the second metal.