Bimodal Parachute Deployment via Sensor-Driven Reefing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing parachute systems face challenges in adapting to varying emergency conditions, such as high speeds and altitudes, due to weight limitations that prevent the use of multiple parachutes, leading to potential parachute rip or inadequate deployment.

Innovation Solution

A bimodal parachute deployment system that includes a load limiting device and a state controller, which uses sensor information to adjust the parachute's load by deploying appropriate parachutes and load limiting devices based on altitude, speed, and flight trajectory, employing mechanisms like shock absorbers and reefing devices to manage load and prevent rip during deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple varying parachutes are used to suit different emergency conditions, then the adaptability and safety are improved, but the weight of the system increases beyond limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different emergency conditionsVSAvoidweight of parachute system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The parachute system is divided into two distinct parachute types (first and second parachutes) with different deployment characteristics, allowing the system to handle varying emergency conditions by selecting the appropriate parachute type based on real-time sensor data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different parachute configurations based on real-time sensor information about aircraft conditions, enabling adaptability without requiring multiple complete parachute systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Weight of moving object

If a single parachute is used to meet weight limitations, then the weight is reduced, but the reliability decreases under varying emergency conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of parachute systemVSAvoidreliability of parachute deployment
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes operational parameters by switching between different parachute types and deployment modes based on sensor feedback, maintaining reliability across varying conditions without increasing system weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Sensor information provides real-time feedback about aircraft conditions, enabling the system to select the appropriate parachute deployment mode to ensure reliable operation under the specific emergency conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If high-speed deployment is implemented, then the response time is reduced, but the risk of parachute rip increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidparachute structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts deployment speed and sequence based on real-time sensor data, enabling fast response when conditions permit while preventing parachute rip when structural integrity is at risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Sensor information provides real-time feedback on aircraft speed and conditions, allowing the control system to modulate deployment parameters to balance rapid response with parachute structural safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively deploys the appropriate parachute type for different conditions, ensuring safe recovery of aircraft by managing load and preventing parachute rip, thereby enhancing safety and reliability in emergency situations.

Implementation Method 1

employing mechanisms like shock absorbers and reefing devices to manage load and prevent rip during deployment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

employing mechanisms like shock absorbers and reefing devices to manage load and prevent rip during deployment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS11628941B2Bimodal parachute deployment system
Publication Date: 2023.04.18 KITTY HAWK CORP
  • US11628941B2 patent drawing
  • US11628941B2 patent drawing
  • US11628941B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is disclosed that includes an interface which receives sensor information associated with a vehicle, a severing tool, a parachute load limiting device state controller, and a reefing device. The controller determines, based at least in part on the sensor information, whether to instruct the severing tool to release a reefing device prior to parachute deployment. If it is determined to instruct the severing tool to release the reefing device prior to the parachute deployment, the severing tool is so instructed. If it is determined to not instruct the severing tool to release the reefing device prior to the parachute deployment, the reefing device is configured to be situated around a parachute canopy to constrain the parachute canopy during an initial state and slide down the parachute canopy to a position below the parachute canopy to constrain one or more parachute tethers.