Bimodal Recommendation Engine Using Cluster Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for information management in professional fields overwhelm users with a broad spectrum of choices, making it difficult to find relevant information, leading to wasted time and potential settlement for less relevant matches.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system utilizing cluster filtering, collaborative filtering, dynamic expert verification, and search algorithms to recommend items and peers by analyzing user profiles, behavior patterns, and expertise indicators, prioritizing relevance and credibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If prior art systems provide a broad spectrum of information choices, then information coverage is improved, but user experience deteriorates due to overwhelming choices and difficulty finding relevant information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation coverageVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops by monitoring user interactions with recommended items and adjusting future recommendations accordingly. The recommendation engine learns from user behavior patterns, consumption habits, and engagement metrics to continuously improve recommendation accuracy, resolving the contradiction between providing broad information coverage and maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-service mechanisms through automated recommendation algorithms that autonomously analyze user profiles, behavior patterns, and item characteristics to generate personalized recommendations without requiring manual user effort. This resolves the contradiction by automatically filtering broad information spectra into personalized, easy-to-navigate recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If prior art systems present many potential matches, then information completeness is improved, but time efficiency deteriorates due to user diligence requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidtime efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and prioritizes the most relevant information from the broad spectrum of available matches using recommendation algorithms. By taking out and presenting only the top-ranked recommendations based on user profiles and behavior patterns, the system maintains information completeness while eliminating the need for users to manually review numerous potential matches, thus resolving the time efficiency contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing and ranking information matches before presentation to users. The recommendation engine pre-calculates relevance scores, filters potential matches, and organizes results in advance, so users receive ready-to-review recommendations rather than raw unprocessed data, resolving the contradiction between completeness and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If prior art systems provide broad information choices, then selection range is improved, but recommendation accuracy deteriorates due to settling for less relevant matches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection rangeVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring recommendation precision to individual user contexts. Instead of applying uniform filtering across all users, the system customizes recommendation accuracy for each user based on their unique profile, behavior patterns, and preferences. This allows the system to maintain broad selection ranges while achieving high recommendation accuracy for each individual user, resolving the contradiction between selection range and recommendation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8661034B2Bimodal recommendation engine for recommending items and peers
Publication Date: 2014.02.25 GARTNER INC
  • US8661034B2 patent drawing
  • US8661034B2 patent drawing
  • US8661034B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A networked peer and item recommendation system makes recommendations to users such as documents of interest and peers with whom the users may want to connect. User profile information is maintained in a profiles database. A log enables the collection of user behavior information. A cluster filtering algorithm determines a cluster that a querying user belongs to. A collaborative filtering algorithm locates other users having implicit and explicit profiles in the database that are similar to the profile of the querying user. A dynamic expert verification algorithm is associated with the collaborative filtering algorithm to verify the qualifications of users and produce bias towards users with higher quality interactions. A search engine returns items based on a keyword provided by the querying user. A sorting algorithm sorts the items returned by the cluster filtering algorithm, collaborative filtering algorithm and search engine for presentation to the querying user.