Event Recognition Using Binarized Spatial-Dynamic Vectors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional video recognition systems face challenges in recognizing rare events due to variations in appearance and dynamic characteristics, requiring extensive training data and struggling with uncertainty and viewpoint changes, especially when limited training data is available.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a probabilistic state-space model using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) with semantic primitives, converting continuous vectors to binarized vectors using thresholds to represent spatial-dynamic relationships, allowing for robust event recognition with minimal training data and intuitive model creation by users.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a rule-based method is used for event recognition, then the system can operate without extensive training data, but the system lacks robustness over variation in appearance and dynamic characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining dataVSAvoidrobustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms continuous spatial-dynamic parameters into discrete binarized vectors using thresholds. This parameter transformation allows the model to capture essential event characteristics while being robust to variations in appearance and dynamics, resolving the contradiction between needing less training data and maintaining robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing to different aspects of event representation: continuous vectors preserve fine-grained spatial-dynamic information where precision matters, while binarized vectors provide robust categorical classification where variability is expected. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by applying appropriate representation strategies to different features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If a probabilistic method is used for event recognition, then uncertainty reasoning is performed, but many training examples are required to establish model parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuncertainty reasoningVSAvoidtraining data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential categorical characteristics of events by converting continuous vectors to binarized vectors. This extraction process retains the core semantic information needed for uncertainty reasoning while discarding redundant continuous variations that would require extensive training data to model, thus resolving the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

By transforming continuous parameters into discrete binarized representations, the system reduces the complexity of parameter estimation. Instead of learning complex continuous probability distributions from大量 training data, the system learns simpler categorical probabilities, enabling effective uncertainty reasoning with minimal training examples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If detailed distributions of temporal trajectories are learned from training data, then recognition accuracy improves, but the model cannot process unseen data without adequate training data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecognition accuracyVSAvoidgeneralization to unseen data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the continuous spatial-dynamic information into discrete binarized categories. This segmentation creates a hierarchical representation where coarse categorical information provides generalization to unseen data, while fine-grained continuous information maintains recognition accuracy for known event types, resolving the contradiction between precision and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If the optimal number of states is experimentally learned, then the HMM model fits training data well, but semantic meanings are difficult to attach to the states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel fitVSAvoidsemantic interpretation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of learning abstract state representations and then trying to interpret them semantically, the system inverts the approach by defining states based on semantic primitives first, then learning the transition probabilities. This inversion makes semantic interpretation straightforward while maintaining good model fit through probabilistic learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS7545954B2System for recognizing events
Publication Date: 2009.06.09 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US7545954B2 patent drawing
  • US7545954B2 patent drawing
  • US7545954B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system recognizes events. The system includes a sequence of continuous vectors and a sequence of binarized vectors. The sequence of continuous vectors represents spatial-dynamic relationships of objects in a predetermined recognition area. The sequence of binarized vectors is derived from the sequence of continuous vectors by utilizing thresholds for determining binary values for each spatial-dynamic relationship. The sequence of binarized vectors indicates whether an event has occurred.