Binary Mechanical Computing Mechanism Reducing Energy Dissipation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical computing systems are complex, energy-inefficient, and dissipate excessive energy due to friction and vibrations, failing to achieve the Landauer Limit for reversible operations, and require numerous basic parts that complicate design and assembly.

Innovation Solution

A binary mechanical computing mechanism using anchor blocks, links, and rotary joints to perform combinatorial and sequential logic operations with reduced energy dissipation, employing Mechanical Linkage Logic (MLL), Mechanical Flexure Logic (MFL), and Mechanical Cable Logic (MCL) paradigms that minimize friction and vibrations, allowing for reversible operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional mechanical computing systems use numerous basic parts (gears, shafts, bearings, springs, detents, ratchets), then the system can perform computing operations, but the device complexity increases and energy dissipation increases due to friction and vibrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of basic partsVSAvoidenergy dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary basic parts from traditional mechanical computing systems. By removing gears, shafts, bearings, springs, detents, and ratchets, the system reduces both device complexity and energy dissipation while retaining essential computing functionality through a minimized set of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple functions into fewer components. By combining the roles of various basic parts into a unified mechanical structure, the system achieves computing operations with reduced part count, lower complexity, and decreased energy loss from friction and vibrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Device complexity

If traditional mechanical computing systems use numerous basic parts, then the system can perform computing operations, but the design and assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of basic partsVSAvoiddesign and assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes unnecessary basic parts from the system, directly reducing design complexity and simplifying assembly procedures. Fewer components mean fewer design decisions, fewer manufacturing steps, and simpler assembly processes while maintaining computing functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Use of energy by moving object

If mechanical computing systems operate with friction and vibrations, then computing operations can be performed, but energy efficiency decreases and the system fails to achieve the Landauer Limit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidenergy dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses friction and vibrations not by fighting them directly but by minimizing their sources through component reduction. By eliminating unnecessary moving parts, the system converts the harmful effects of friction and vibrations into beneficial simplicity, achieving energy efficiency closer to the theoretical Landauer Limit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentEP3398024B1Mechanical computing systems
Publication Date: 2023.09.06 CBN NANO TECH INC
  • EP3398024B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3398024B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3398024B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Systems and methods for creating mechanical computing mechanisms and Turing-complete systems which include combinatorial logic and sequential logic, and are energy-efficient. Embodiments of the invention include mechanical computing mechanisms and computational systems which have lower energy dissipation, a smaller number of basic parts, and other advantages over previous systems. Multiple embodiments are disclosed including mechanical link logic, mechanical flexure logic, and mechanical cable logic, along with design paradigms (including both mechanical designs, principles, and a novel classification system which categorizes systems as Types 1 through 4) that teach how to apply the general principles to other embodiments.