Binaural Sound Spatialization via Iterative Filter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spatial sound reproduction techniques require extraction of interaural delays, which increases computational resources and doubles the number of filters needed for decoding, limiting the quality of sound rendering with a low number of channels.

Innovation Solution

A method for optimizing decoding filters and encoding gains by minimizing an error function through iterative optimization, allowing for good reconstruction of delays and amplitudes using a low number of channels, without the need for explicit delay extraction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If interaural delays are extracted from HRTF functions, then sound spatialization accuracy is improved, but computational resources increase and the number of decoding filters doubles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatialization accuracyVSAvoidnumber of decoding filters
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the delay extraction and spatialization functions into a single optimized decoding filter. Instead of separating delay extraction as a distinct step that doubles the filter count, the invention integrates delay compensation directly into the decoding filter design, allowing both functions to be achieved with a reduced filter set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The optimized decoding filters serve multiple functions simultaneously: they perform spatialization, delay compensation, and amplitude adjustment in a single operation. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate processing steps and reduces the overall computational complexity while maintaining spatialization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If interaural delays are extracted and applied, then sound rendering quality is improved, but the number of channels and computational resources double

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound rendering qualityVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies delay compensation selectively through optimized filters rather than uniformly across all channels. By using partial action (applying delays only where necessary through the filter structure) rather than excessive action (applying to all channels separately), the patent achieves high sound rendering quality without doubling the computational load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes filter parameters to simultaneously achieve delay compensation and spatialization. By changing the parameter optimization approach from separate delay extraction to joint filter optimization, the system achieves high rendering quality with reduced computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If a low number of channels is used, then computational resources are reduced, but the quality of sound rendering deteriorates without explicit delay extraction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidsound rendering quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the optimization parameters of the decoding filters to jointly optimize for both delay compensation and spatialization accuracy. This parameter optimization allows the system to achieve high sound rendering quality with a low number of channels, resolving the contradiction between computational efficiency and rendering quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary optimization of the decoding filter parameters to pre-compensate for delays and spatialization requirements. This preliminary action embedded in the filter design eliminates the need for separate delay extraction steps, maintaining high rendering quality with reduced channel count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP1992198B1Optimization of binaural sound spatialization based on multichannel encoding
Publication Date: 2016.07.20 ORANGE SA
  • EP1992198B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1992198B1 patent drawingFigure 2~5
  • EP1992198B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4C

AI summary

The invention concerns sound spatialization with multichannel encoding for binaural reproduction on two loudspeakers, the spatial encoding being defined by encoding functions associated with multiple encoding channels and the decoding by applying filters for binaural reproduction. The invention provides for an optimization as follows: a) obtaining a original set of acoustic transfer functions particular to an individual's morphology (HRIR;HRTF), b) selecting spatial encoding functions ( g(?, ?,n) ) and/or decoding filters ( F(t,n) ), and c) through successive iterations, optimizing the filters associated with the selected encoding functions or the encoding functions associated with the selected filters, or jointly the selected filters and encoding functions, by minimizing an error (c(HRIR,HRIR*)) calculated based on a comparison between: the original set of transfer functions (HRIR), and a set of reconstructed transfer functions (HRIR*) from encoding functions and decoding filters, whether optimized and/or selected.