Binder-Free Electrodes Using Conductive Nanomaterial Matrices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries and other energy storage devices face challenges in achieving high energy densities, long lifetimes, and reduced toxicity, while also being cost-effective and environmentally benign, with existing designs often suffering from capacity loss due to structural changes during electrochemical cycling.

Innovation Solution

The development of electrodes comprising electrochemically active nanoparticles, such as 3d-transition metal oxides, integrated with a conductive nanomaterial matrix like carbon nanotubes or graphene, which eliminates the need for binder materials, allowing for higher active material loading and improved energy density, rate capability, and mechanical integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional electrode materials are used, then structural stability is maintained, but energy density and reversible capacity are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereversible capacityVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode material is divided into nanoparticle form rather than bulk form. This segmentation increases the surface area to volume ratio, allowing more active sites for lithium insertion/extraction while reducing the structural stress during cycling, thereby achieving both high reversible capacity and structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials combining metal oxides (Fe2O3, Fe3O4, MoO3, CoO, NiO) with conductive carbon materials. This composite structure provides both high capacity from the metal oxide nanoparticles and structural stability from the carbon matrix, resolving the contradiction between capacity and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If binder materials are used in electrode fabrication, then mechanical integrity is maintained, but energy density is reduced due to inactive material content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidmechanical integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates binder materials from the electrode structure. By using metal oxide nanoparticles that inherently maintain mechanical integrity through their nanoparticle architecture and surface treatments, the inactive binder component is removed, increasing the proportion of active material and thus energy density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The nanoparticle surface is treated with conductive coatings or functional groups that provide local mechanical strength and electrical conductivity at the particle level, replacing the need for bulk binder materials while maintaining overall electrode integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If high-capacity materials are used, then reversible capacity is improved, but cost and toxicity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereversible capacityVSAvoidtoxicity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material composition parameters by using abundant, non-toxic elements (Fe, Mo, Co, Ni) in nanoparticle form. This parameter change allows achieving high reversible capacity (>1000 mAh/g) while avoiding rare, expensive, or toxic materials, thus resolving the contradiction between capacity and environmental benignity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Speed

If bulk particle structures are used, then material stability is maintained, but rate capability and energy density are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate capabilityVSAvoidenergy density
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The bulk particle structure is segmented into nanoparticles with dimensions in the nanometer range. This segmentation dramatically reduces the diffusion distance for lithium ions and electrons, enabling fast charge/discharge rates (high rate capability) while the high surface area to volume ratio increases the amount of active material accessible for reactions, thereby improving energy density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting electrodes demonstrate enhanced reversible capacity, stability, and rate capability, with specific capacities of up to 1000 mAh/g at C rate and 600 mAh/g at 10C, sustained over multiple cycles, making them suitable for high-performance energy storage applications.

Implementation Method 1

a matrix or net of electrically conductive nanomaterial, such as carbon nanotubes or other carbon-based nanomaterials, that binds the active material nanoparticles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConduction (electrical): Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

carbon nanotubes or other carbon-based nanomaterials, may be used to form a binder-free, yet mechanically-intact electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

the 3d transition metal oxides are reduced in a conversion reaction to small metal clusters, and the oxygen reacts with the lithium to form Li2O

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox Reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 4

nanoscale active material particles... Differing from the intercalation mechanism occurring with graphite, the 3d transition metal oxides are reduced in a conversion reaction to small metal clusters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNanocomposite: Nanocomposite

Data Source

PatentUS9543054B2Method of fabricating electrodes including high-capacity, binder-free anodes for lithium-ion batteries
Publication Date: 2017.01.10 ALLIANCE FOR ENERGY INNOVATION LLC
  • US9543054B2 patent drawing
  • US9543054B2 patent drawing
  • US9543054B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrode (110) is provided that may be used in an electrochemical device (100) such as an energy storage/discharge device, e.g., a lithium-ion battery, or an electrochromic device, e.g., a smart window. Hydrothermal techniques and vacuum filtration methods were applied to fabricate the electrode (110). The electrode (110) includes an active portion (140) that is made up of electrochemically active nanoparticles, with one embodiment utilizing 3d-transition metal oxides to provide the electrochemical capacity of the electrode (110). The active material (140) may include other electrochemical materials, such as silicon, tin, lithium manganese oxide, and lithium iron phosphate. The electrode (110) also includes a matrix or net (170) of electrically conductive nanomaterial that acts to connect and/or bind the active nanoparticles (140) such that no binder material is required in the electrode (110), which allows more active materials (140) to be included to improve energy density and other desirable characteristics of the electrode. The matrix material (170) may take the form of carbon nanotubes, such as single-wall, double-wall, and/or multi-wall nanotubes, and be provided as about 2 to 30 percent weight of the electrode (110) with the rest being the active material (140).