Binder Apparatus Lever Slider Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional binders face challenges in easily transitioning and securing closure members between open and closed positions, often requiring complex mechanisms and risking paper snagging or jamming due to structural limitations.

Innovation Solution

The binder apparatus employs a housing, lever assembly, and movable slider with carrier rails that utilize tapered locking elements and detents to securely transition between open and closed positions, minimizing parts and preventing paper snagging through flush surface alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional binder mechanisms are used, then closure members can be secured, but the mechanism becomes complex and risks paper snagging or jamming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring closure membersVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The binder mechanism is segmented into distinct functional components: a lever assembly for actuation, a slider for linear movement, and locking elements with detents for positioning. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, simplifying the overall mechanism while maintaining reliability in securing closure members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential function of securing closure members from complex conventional mechanisms by using a simplified lever-slider-locking element system. The lever assembly directly actuates the slider, which in turn engages or disengages the locking elements from detents, removing unnecessary intermediate components that cause complexity and potential paper snagging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If complex mechanisms are used to secure closure members, then reliability improves, but ease of operation deteriorates due to increased complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring closure membersVSAvoidtransitioning closure members
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking elements are designed to automatically engage with detents on the slider through spring biasing, without requiring manual intervention. When the lever assembly moves the slider, the locking elements self-engage or self-disengage from the detents, making the operation intuitive and easy while maintaining secure closure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism uses a dynamic lever assembly that converts rotational or linear motion into slider movement, which then dynamically engages or disengages the locking elements. This dynamic action allows smooth transitions between open and closed positions, improving ease of operation while maintaining reliability through positive locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If structural limitations exist in conventional binders, then manufacturing is simpler, but paper snagging or jamming increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinder structureVSAvoidpaper snagging or jamming
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The closure members and carrier rails are designed with locally optimized surfaces that are flush and smooth in the regions where papers contact them. The lever assembly and slider are positioned to move in a manner that maintains consistent clearance from papers, eliminating protruding structures that could cause snagging or jamming while keeping the overall structure simple to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Object-affected harmful factors

If flush surface alignment is achieved to prevent paper snagging, then paper safety improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreventing paper snaggingVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lever assembly, slider, and locking elements are merged into an integrated mechanism where the slider moves linearly within the housing and directly actuates the locking elements. This merging eliminates the need for separate adjustment mechanisms or complex linkages, achieving flush surface alignment through the natural geometry of the combined components without increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10562336B2Binder apparatus
Publication Date: 2020.02.18 HORN HANS JOHANN
  • US10562336B2 patent drawing
  • US10562336B2 patent drawing
  • US10562336B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example binder apparatus is disclosed. An example binder apparatus includes a housing having a first side surface, a second side surface, and an inner central surface extending between the first side surface and the second side surface. The example binder apparatus also includes a first carrier rail including a first longitudinal edge and a second longitudinal edge, the first carrier rail including a first tab to extend away from the inner central surface of the housing, the first longitudinal edge disposed adjacent the first side surface of the housing. The example binder apparatus also includes a second carrier rail including a third longitudinal edge and a fourth longitudinal edge, the second carrier rail including a second tab to extend away from the inner central surface of the housing, the third longitudinal edge disposed adjacent the second side surface of the housing, the second longitudinal edge hingably engaging the fourth longitudinal edge. In addition, the example binder apparatus includes a slider including a locking block extending therefrom, the locking block disposed in a space between the first tab and the second tab when the binder apparatus is in a closed position and the locking block is disposed outside of the space between the first tab and the second tab when the binder apparatus is in an open position.