Binding Device Sliding Guide Mechanism for Reduced Friction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing binding devices face issues with movement resistance and component accuracy due to complex configurations, such as roller-based systems, which lead to increased weight, size, and reduced service life, while sliding-based systems suffer from frictional resistance and wear-related inaccuracies.

Innovation Solution

A binding device with a stapling unit that includes a first moving unit for movement along the medium's width direction, a second moving unit supported by the first unit and moving inclined, and a contact unit with a low-friction sliding ring that reduces frictional resistance by sliding along a guide track, minimizing component complexity and wear-related issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a roller-based system is used to guide the binding device, then the device can move smoothly, but the weight and size increase due to additional rotation mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesmooth movementVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the roller-based rotation mechanism entirely, extracting the unnecessary rotational component from the system. The binding device moves purely through sliding contact with guide surfaces, eliminating the weight and complexity of rollers while maintaining smooth movement through proper guide surface design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The movement system is segmented into independent sliding components that move along separate guide surfaces. The first moving unit slides along guides in the width direction, while the second moving unit slides along guides in the inclined direction, allowing each to be optimized independently without requiring interconnected roller mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If a roller-based system is used to guide the binding device, then the device can move smoothly, but the size increases due to additional rotation mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesmooth movementVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the roller-based rotation mechanism entirely, extracting the unnecessary rotational component from the system. The binding device moves purely through sliding contact with guide surfaces, eliminating the volume occupied by rollers and their support structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a rotational movement mechanism to a sliding mechanism that operates in linear dimensions. By using guide surfaces that extend in the movement directions (width direction and inclined direction), the system achieves smooth movement through dimensional reorientation rather than rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If a sliding-based system is used to guide the binding device, then the device structure is simplified, but frictional resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidfrictional resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different surface properties to different guide surfaces to minimize friction locally. The guide surfaces are designed with specific geometric characteristics (flat surfaces extending in movement directions) that create optimal sliding conditions for each particular movement path, reducing frictional resistance while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If a complex binding device configuration is used, then binding accuracy can be maintained, but movement resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding accuracyVSAvoidmovement resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The binding device is segmented into functional units (first moving unit, second moving unit, binding unit) that move independently along their respective guide surfaces. This segmentation allows each unit to be optimized for its specific movement path, maintaining binding accuracy through precise guide surface geometry while minimizing overall movement resistance by eliminating unnecessary components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration suppresses movement resistance and maintains binding accuracy by reducing the number of components, allowing for miniaturization and extended service life with reduced maintenance costs, while enabling efficient corner binding without dedicated rotation mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

a contact unit with a low-friction sliding ring that reduces frictional resistance by sliding along a guide track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20240262649A1Binding device, post-processing device, and image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.08.08 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US20240262649A1 patent drawing
  • US20240262649A1 patent drawing
  • US20240262649A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A binding device includes: a binding unit that binds a plurality of media; a first moving unit that moves along a width direction of the medium; a second moving unit that is supported by the first moving unit, supports the binding unit, and moves in an inclined direction with respect to the width direction of the medium; and a contact unit that is supported by the first moving unit and comes into contact with a guide unit that extends in a movement direction of the first moving unit.