Bio-Based Waterborne Polyurethane Hybrid for Stable Fluorine-Free Repellency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluorine-free water repellents face issues such as high production costs, complex synthesis processes, poor dispersion, low stability, limited fabric versatility, color differences, and low biomass content, with many products failing to meet environmental and performance standards.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to prepare a bio-based polyurethane-acrylic hybrid fluorine-free water repellent through a two-step process involving homogeneous polymerization and polymerization, using bio-based isocyanate, sorbitol, fatty acid-substituted glycolipid, and dihydroxyl-terminated polydialkylsiloxane to create a stable waterborne polyurethane intermediate, which is then combined with an acrylic-based fluorine-free water repellent to achieve a high biomass content and improved stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fluorine-free water repellents (acrylic polymers, dendrimers, waterborne polyurethane) are used, then water-repellent effect is achieved, but production cost is high and synthesis process is complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater-repellent effectVSAvoidproduction cost and synthesis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters by using bio-based isocyanate compounds instead of conventional petrochemical isocyanates, and employs polycondensation reaction under controlled conditions to synthesize waterborne polyurethane with improved biomass content (above 60%) while simplifying the synthesis process and reducing production costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite water-repellent system by combining waterborne polyurethane (with biomass content above 60%) and acrylic polymer in specific ratios, achieving both high biomass content and satisfactory water-repellent performance while maintaining cost-effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If waterborne polyurethane is produced under severe reaction conditions and specific dispersion technique, then water-repellent performance is achieved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater-repellent performanceVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the reaction parameters by using bio-based isocyanate compounds and controlling polycondensation under milder conditions, eliminating the need for severe reaction conditions and specific dispersion techniques while maintaining water-repellent performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs cost-effective bio-based isocyanate compounds and standard polycondensation techniques instead of expensive conventional materials and specialized dispersion processes, significantly reducing production costs while achieving comparable performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If dendrimers and acrylic polymers are used, then production cost is low, but application selectivity is high and fabric versatility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costVSAvoidfabric versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a water-repellent formulation based on waterborne polyurethane with broad applicability across different fabric types (cotton, polyester, nylon, leather, paper), achieving universal water-repellent effect without the selectivity limitations of dendrimers and acrylic polymers, while maintaining cost-effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite system combining waterborne polyurethane (above 60% biomass) and acrylic polymer that leverages the cost advantage of acrylic while adding the versatility of polyurethane, achieving both low cost and broad fabric applicability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If polyurethane polymers are used, then water-repellent effect is achieved, but dispersion and storage stability are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater-repellent effectVSAvoiddispersion and storage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters by synthesizing waterborne polyurethane with controlled molecular weight and using bio-based isocyanate compounds that improve dispersion properties, achieving both water-repellent effect and enhanced storage stability without precipitation or phase separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent formulates a composite system combining waterborne polyurethane (above 60% biomass) with acrylic polymer and appropriate dispersants, where the synergistic effect improves dispersion stability and storage characteristics while maintaining water-repellent performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

5Quantity of substance

If extra bio-based ingredients (glycerin, starch, saccharide) are added to increase biomass content, then biomass content increases, but water-repelling performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiomass contentVSAvoidwater-repelling performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by using bio-based isocyanate compounds as core building blocks and controlling polycondensation to achieve above 60% biomass content through meaningful chemical bonds in the polyurethane structure, rather than adding unrelated bio-based fillers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary bio-based fillers (glycerin, starch, saccharide) that dilute performance, focusing instead on incorporating bio-based isocyanate compounds that form functional polyurethane chains, achieving high biomass content with sustained water-repelling performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

6Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional fluorine-free water repellents are used, then environmental protection is improved by eliminating fluorine, but fabric color difference and washability are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluorine eliminationVSAvoidfabric color difference and washability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition by using bio-based isocyanate compounds and controlling polycondensation to create waterborne polyurethane with improved washability and color retention, eliminating fluorine while maintaining or enhancing fabric durability and appearance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite water-repellent system combining waterborne polyurethane (above 60% biomass) and acrylic polymer that eliminates fluorine while achieving satisfactory washability and minimal fabric color change through the synergistic properties of the components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method results in a water repellent with high biomass content, superior stability, and enhanced water-repelling performance, maintaining effectiveness even after multiple washes and without significant color change, surpassing commercially available products in terms of performance and versatility.

Implementation Method 1

adding 0.05 to 0.3 part by weight of a first initiator to a mixture of step (a) to carry out polymerization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

adding 50.0 to 70.0 parts by weight of water, 1.0 to 4.0 parts by weight of an emulsifier, and 0.2 to 0.8 part by weight of acetic acid to the product of step (b) to form the bio-based waterborne polyurethane intermediate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEmulsion: Emulsion

Data Source

PatentUS12570788B2Method of preparing bio-based waterborne polyurethane intermediate, bio-polyurethane-acrylic hybrid fluorine-free water repellent and the application thereof
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 JINEX CORP
  • US12570788B2 patent drawing
  • US12570788B2 patent drawing
  • US12570788B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method of preparing a bio-based waterborne polyurethane intermediate. The method comprises the following steps: (a) mixing bio-based isocyanate compound, sorbitol, fatty acid-substituted glycolipid, dihydroxyl-terminated polydialkylsiloxane, and a solvent; (b) adding a first initiator to a mixture of step (a) to carry out polymerization; and (c) adding water, an emulsifier, and acetic acid to the product of step (b) to form the bio-based waterborne polyurethane intermediate. The present disclosure also provides a method of preparing a bio-based polyurethane-acrylic hybrid fluorine-free water repellent. The bio-based polyurethane-acrylic hybrid fluorine-free water repellent is derived from aforesaid bio-based waterborne polyurethane intermediate and an acrylic-based fluorine-free water repellent.