Bio-propane Purification via Hydrotreatment and Catalyst Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing bio-based polypropylene, propylene oxide, and acrylic acid face limitations in industrial-scale production due to challenges in processing bio-based materials, including high hydrogen consumption, carbon oxide generation, and contamination issues with carbonyl sulphide, which affect the quality and yield of bio-propane and its derivatives.

Innovation Solution

A method involving hydrotreatment of bio-renewable oils and fats with a sulphided metal catalyst, followed by gas-liquid separation, fractionation, and purification to produce high-purity bio-propane, which can be further processed into bio-propylene and bio-polymers, utilizing a diluent to control temperature and reduce decarb-reactions, and recycling hydrogen to minimize energy consumption and impurity levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional hydrotreatment methods are used to produce bio-propane from bio-based materials, then the process can proceed with established technology, but high amounts of hydrogen are consumed and significant carbon oxides are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess establishmentVSAvoidhydrogen consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the hydrotreatment process by using a bifunctional catalyst system (metal function + acid function) and optimizing reaction conditions (temperature 200-400°C, pressure 10-100 bar, LHSV 0.1-5.0 h⁻¹) to promote hydrodeoxygenation while minimizing decarboxylation and decarbonylation reactions, thereby reducing CO and CO2 generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of oxygen-containing compounds in bio-based materials into a beneficial process feature by using the oxygenates as in-situ hydrogen donors through hydrodeoxygenation reactions, reducing the need for external hydrogen supply while producing high-quality paraffinic hydrocarbons

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Use of energy by moving object

If decarb-reactions are promoted to reduce hydrogen consumption, then hydrogen usage decreases, but carbon oxides (CO and CO2) are generated in high amounts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen consumptionVSAvoidcarbon oxide generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully controls reaction parameters (temperature, pressure, catalyst composition) to favor hydrodeoxygenation over decarboxylation and decarbonylation, achieving a balance where oxygen is removed as water rather than CO/CO2, thus minimizing carbon oxide generation while maintaining reasonable hydrogen consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The bifunctional catalyst acts as an intermediary that facilitates hydrodeoxygenation through a mechanism involving metal sites for hydrogen activation and acid sites for oxygen removal, providing an alternative pathway that avoids CO and CO2 formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If thermal cracking is used to produce propylene from bio-naphtha, then propylene can be obtained, but the process generates significant impurities including carbonyl sulphide that contaminate the bio-propane

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropylene productionVSAvoidbio-propane purity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes impurities including carbonyl sulphide, H2S, CO2, and CO from the reaction product stream through a series of purification steps (washing, adsorption, distillation) to produce high-purity bio-propane suitable for catalytic applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate purification stage between production and final application, using multiple separation techniques to remove contaminants, thereby mediating between the impure thermal cracking output and the purity requirements for catalytic dehydrogenation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If bio-propane is produced with high purity through extensive purification, then the quality for catalytic applications improves, but the process complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebio-propane purityVSAvoidpurification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary purification steps early in the process flow, removing major impurities (H2S, CO2, carbonyl sulphide) before subsequent processing stages, thereby simplifying downstream operations and reducing overall process complexity while achieving high final purity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances the yield of high-quality liquid and gaseous hydrocarbon products, reduces hydrogen consumption, and minimizes impurities, enabling the production of bio-propane with high purity suitable for high-value applications such as catalytic dehydrogenation to bio-propylene, ultimately facilitating the production of bio-based polymers.

Implementation Method 1

Upon hydrogenation, this glycerol backbone is usually converted into bio-propane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 2

H2O cleaved by hydrotreatment (HDO) from the organic oxygenates present in the bio-based fresh feed material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodeoxygenation: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 3

CO and CO2 cleaved by decarbonylation and decarboxylation (in the following sometimes simply referred to as decarb reactions) of C3+ organic oxygenates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecarbonylation: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 4

CO and CO2 cleaved by decarbonylation and decarboxylation (in the following sometimes simply referred to as decarb reactions) of C3+ organic oxygenates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecarboxylation: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 5

subjecting the hydrotreated effluent to gas-liquid separation so as to provide a gaseous hydrotreated material comprising H2, bio-propane, H2O, H2S, CO2, and CO, and a liquid hydrotreated material comprising paraffinic hydrocarbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 6

fractionating the dried H2S, CO2 and H2 depleted gaseous stream to recover a bio-propane gas composition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Data Source

PatentUS20230020748A1Method for upgrading bio-based material and upgraded material
Publication Date: 2023.01.19 NESTE OYJ
  • US20230020748A1 patent drawing
  • US20230020748A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method for upgrading a bio-based material, the method including the steps of pre-treating bio-renewable oil(s) and/or fat(s) to provide a bio-based fresh feed material, hydrotreating the bio-based fresh feed material, followed by separation, to provide a bio-propane composition.