Bio-stimulation Algorithm for Targeted Neural Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cranial nerve stimulation methods, both invasive and non-invasive, face limitations in accuracy and safety due to reliance on trial and error processes, with non-invasive methods being particularly inefficient in targeting specific brain areas and potentially causing prolonged stimulation times and safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that derive a systematic algorithm from bio-related information using time-series data to determine the optimal bio-stimulation signal, applying it to the living body through a stimulation unit controlled by a control unit, which analyzes bio-responses to refine the stimulation protocol, minimizing trial and error by establishing a matrix-based relationship between bio-stimulation and bio-response information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If non-invasive stimulation methods are used to avoid surgical risks, then safety is improved, but stimulation accuracy deteriorates requiring trial and error processes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidstimulation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously measures bio-information (neural activity, muscle response, etc.) during stimulation and uses this feedback to automatically adjust stimulation parameters in real-time, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains accuracy without trial-and-error

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes multiple stimulation parameters (intensity, frequency, pulse width, electrode position) based on real-time bio-information analysis, allowing precise targeting of specific brain regions while maintaining safety through automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If trial and error stimulation is performed to achieve accurate targeting, then stimulation accuracy may be improved, but stimulation time increases causing safety problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetargeting accuracyVSAvoidstimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of target brain regions using bio-information measurement and pattern recognition algorithms before applying stimulation, pre-determining optimal electrode positions and parameters to eliminate iterative trial-and-error processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical trial-and-error adjustment process with an automated computational system that uses algorithms to calculate optimal stimulation parameters based on measured bio-information, significantly reducing adjustment time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If conventional command sets based on experience rules are used, then implementation is simplified, but precision and accuracy are limited due to incomplete knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidstimulation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal stimulation parameters by analyzing bio-information and applying computational algorithms, eliminating the need for operator expertise and experience-based decision-making while maintaining high precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple sources of information (neural activity patterns, anatomical data, physiological responses) and combines them through computational algorithms to create a comprehensive control strategy that exceeds the precision of any single experience-based rule

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS9381352B2Method for stimulating living body more accurately and apparatus using the same
Publication Date: 2016.07.05 Y BRAIN
  • US9381352B2 patent drawing
  • US9381352B2 patent drawing
  • US9381352B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for more accurately stimulating a living body comprises: a stimulation unit configured to apply a bio-stimulation signal in vicinity to a living body, the bio-stimulation signal being composed of pieces of time-series data having a specific frequency; and a control unit configured to derive bio-stimulation information required to achieve targeted bio-information using time space data indicative of bio-responses interacting at a plurality of different positions in response to the bio-stimulation signal, and derive a relation between the bio-stimulation signal and the bio-responses, and control the stimulation unit to apply the bio-stimulation signal in response to the derived bio-stimulation information. The relation is configured to set the bio-stimulation information as variables in an X matrix (m, t), set the bio-response information as variables in a Y matrix (n, t), and derive an A matrix (n, m) satisfying Y=AX.