Bioactive Material Surface Treatment for Bone Implants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical implants, such as titanium and its alloys, face issues with poor bone integration due to low surface area and contamination from abrasive particles used in techniques like grit-blasting, leading to osteolysis, loosening, and inflammation.

Innovation Solution

A metal or metal alloy substrate with a primary layer having a surface area greater than the substrate, formed through grit blasting or bead coating, followed by chemical treatment in an alkaline solution to create a nano-structured alkali titanate layer, enhancing osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties and reducing contamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If abrasive particle blasting is used to increase surface area, then cell attachment and physical bonding are improved, but surface contamination and abrasive particle embedding occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface areaVSAvoidsurface contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes embedded abrasive particles from the implant surface through chemical etching processes, separating the harmful contamination from the beneficial surface roughness, thereby resolving the contradiction between increased surface area and surface contamination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the surface chemistry parameters through chemical treatment (acid etching, anodizing) to modify the implant surface properties, transforming the contaminated physical surface into a chemically modified surface that maintains increased area while eliminating harmful particles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If plasma spraying or electrochemical anodising is used to modify surface topography, then implant-to-bone integration is enhanced, but fatigue strength decreases and delamination occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant-to-bone integrationVSAvoidfatigue strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical surface modification methods (plasma spraying, abrasive blasting) with chemical etching and electrochemical anodizing processes, substituting mechanical action with chemical reactions to create surface modifications that enhance integration without compromising structural integrity and fatigue strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite surface structure combining the metallic substrate with chemically modified surface layers (oxide layers, etched patterns) that integrate the benefits of enhanced bone integration while maintaining the mechanical strength of the base material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If grit blasting is used to roughen the surface, then osseointegrative properties are improved, but wear on bone and implant increases due to particle detachment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveosseointegrative propertiesVSAvoidwear particles
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes detached abrasive particles through chemical etching and surface treatment processes, eliminating the source of wear particles that would otherwise detach and cause damage to bone and implant tissues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of abrasive particle presence into a beneficial chemical etching process, where the same abrasive exposure is followed by chemical treatment that transforms the contaminated surface into a clean, osteointegrative surface with enhanced properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The increased surface area and nano-structured layer improve bone integration, reducing wear and inflammation, leading to a more secure implant hold and higher success rates in bone repair and replacement procedures.

Implementation Method 1

chemical etching of the metal surface with an alkaline solution to form a primary layer thereon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical etching: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

abrasive particle blasting of the implant surface, alternatively known as grit-blasting or sand blasting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasive particle blasting: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS8980425B2Bioactive material
Publication Date: 2015.03.17 SMITH & NEPHEW PLC
  • US8980425B2 patent drawing
  • US8980425B2 patent drawing
  • US8980425B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a bioactive material and to a method of producing a bioactive material which is suitable for use as an implant or for use as a bone substitute for repairing bone.