Biodegradable Abrasive for Skin Cleansers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current skin cleansers face challenges in achieving a balance between effective cleaning performance and skin compatibility while being biodegradable, sustainable, and environmentally friendly, as existing abrasives often have poor biodegradability, skin tolerance issues, and environmental concerns due to their non-renewable sources and potential allergens.

Innovation Solution

A skin cleanser formulation containing 2-25% abrasives with an average grain size of 100-1000 µm, comprising at least 50% cellulose esters and plasticizers, 5-45% polyhydroxyalkanoate copolymers, 2-30% surfactants, 0.1-10% thickener, and water, which are biodegradable and derived from renewable sources, along with optional additives for improved stability and skin compatibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If plastic-based abrasives (polyethylene or polyurethane) are used, then cleaning performance and skin tolerance are improved, but biodegradability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning performanceVSAvoidbiodegradability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by combining natural flour particles (cellulose-based) with binding agents to create abrasives that maintain the cleaning performance of synthetic materials while being biodegradable. The natural flour provides the abrasive function and biodegradability, while the binding agent ensures structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the properties of natural flour through controlled particle size reduction (grinding to specific grain sizes) and chemical treatment (bleaching, disinfection) to enhance its abrasive performance and stability in cosmetic formulations, transforming it from a non-optimal natural material into an effective biodegradable abrasive

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of substance

If natural flours (shell and core flours) are used, then sustainability is improved, but cleaning performance and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesustainabilityVSAvoidcleaning performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the particle size distribution of natural flours through precise grinding processes and by treating the flours with bleaching agents and disinfectants to modify their surface properties, thereby enhancing cleaning performance and formulation stability while maintaining sustainability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite structures by combining natural flour particles with binding agents and other cosmetic ingredients, forming a composite abrasive system that leverages the sustainability of natural materials while achieving the cleaning performance and stability required for cosmetic applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If mineral abrasives (quartz sand or pumice flour) are used, then cleaning performance is improved, but skin tolerance and environmental impact deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning performanceVSAvoidskin tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces harsh mineral abrasives with composite abrasives made from natural flours (such as almond, oat, or rice flour) combined with binding agents. These natural flour-based abrasives provide effective cleaning through their controlled particle morphology while being gentler on the skin and environmentally friendly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the physical parameters of natural flour particles through controlled grinding to achieve optimal grain size distributions that provide sufficient abrasive action for cleaning while having rounded, softer edges that improve skin tolerance compared to sharp-edged mineral particles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a skin cleanser with enhanced cleaning performance, improved skin tolerance, and high biodegradability, comparable to polyethylene or polyurethane-based products, while being environmentally sustainable and reducing sedimentation in wastewater.

Implementation Method 1

Skin cleaning agents can contain abrasives to improve the cleaning performance, which mechanically support the cleaning effect of surfactant-like components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

The abrasives used according to the invention contain at least 50% by weight of a combination of cellulose esters and plasticizers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBiodegradation: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 3

5% by weight to 45% by weight of one or more copolymers from the group of the polyhydroxyalkanoate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBiodegradation: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 4

b) 2 up to 30% by weight of surfactants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurfactant action: Surfactant

Implementation Method 5

c) 0.1 to 10% by weight of thickener

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThickening:

Data Source

PatentEP3403695B1Biodegradable abrasive agent
Publication Date: 2020.06.24 PETER GREVEN PHYSIODERM GMBH

AI summary

Skin cleansing agent containing a) 2 to 25 wt.% abrasive with a mean particle size of 100 to 1,000 µm containing - at least 50 wt.% of a combination of cellulose ester and plasticizer - 5 to 45 wt.% of a copolymer from the group of polyhydroxyalkanoates b) 2 to 30 wt.% surfactants, c) 0.1 to 10 wt.% thickener, d) water, and optionally other excipients.