Biodegradable Fire Suppressant Composition for Environmental Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fire suppression methods are often non-environmentally friendly, corrosive, and ineffective in rapidly extinguishing fires, particularly in large or hard-to-reach areas, and may pose risks to humans and structures due to water damage and reignition concerns.

Innovation Solution

A biodegradable, non-toxic fire suppressant composed of clay, nitrogen compounds (urea, ammonium sulphate, and ammonium polyphosphates) that forms a barrier, absorbs heat, and displaces oxygen, creating a chemical endothermic reaction to rapidly lower temperatures and prevent combustion, usable in various fire types without causing harm to humans or structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fire suppressants are used to remove oxygen and create barriers, then fire suppression effectiveness is improved, but environmental harm and corrosion increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppression effectivenessVSAvoidenvironmental harm and corrosion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters of fire suppressants by using biodegradable alternatives such as gelatin, starch, or cellulose derivatives instead of traditional harmful chemicals. This maintains fire suppression effectiveness while eliminating environmental harm and corrosion issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite materials combining biodegradable polymers (gelatin, starch, cellulose) with fire-retardant agents. This creates a multi-functional material that provides both fire suppression and environmental safety, resolving the contradiction between effectiveness and environmental harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Temperature

If large amounts of water are used for fire suppression, then cooling effect is improved, but water damage to structures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectVSAvoidwater damage to structures
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the physical state and composition of the suppressant by using gelatin-based gels or starch derivatives that retain moisture in a gel structure. This provides sustained cooling effect without the excessive water application that causes structural damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The biodegradable polymer-based suppressants provide continuous cooling and fire suppression action as they slowly release moisture and form protective char layers. This continuous action maintains temperature control without requiring large volumes of water that would damage structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Duration of action of moving object

If conventional fire retardants are applied to prevent reignition, then fire suppression duration is improved, but toxicity and environmental persistence worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppression durationVSAvoidtoxicity and environmental persistence
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical nature of fire retardants from persistent synthetic chemicals to biodegradable natural polymers like gelatin, starch, and cellulose. These materials maintain fire suppression effectiveness over extended periods while naturally decomposing, eliminating toxicity and environmental persistence issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The biodegradable suppressant materials are designed to be temporarily effective during and after fire suppression, then naturally decompose through biological processes. This allows the materials to be discarded safely without long-term environmental harm, resolving the contradiction between duration of protection and environmental safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively suppresses and prevents fire reignition, reduces firefighting time by two-thirds, is safe for personnel and the environment, and can be applied using existing equipment, minimizing water usage and avoiding structural damage.

Implementation Method 1

The nitrogen compounds will degrade when exposed to high temperatures so the nitrogen will remove the oxygen present in the ambient air, cooling the area. The reaction will also absorb heat, lowering the air temperature dramatically.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEndothermic reaction: Endothermic Reaction

Implementation Method 2

The nitrogen compounds will degrade when exposed to high temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 3

This emanation of massive cold in the form of nitrogen (cold gas) not only dramatically lowers the temperature in the surrounding area, but also displaces a large portion of the available oxygen, isolating the fuel, preventing the oxidation of the combustible material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas displacement:

Implementation Method 4

The clay and the rest of the components will form a barrier that prevents further ignition.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBarrier formation:

Data Source

PatentUS20220323810A1Fire suppressant
Publication Date: 2022.10.13 GREEN CANYON VENTURES LLC

AI summary

A fire suppressant including in weight percent technical urea 10-30%, ammonium sulphate 20-50%, and sodium bentonite 12-26%. The fire suppressant further includes polypropylene glycol (polyglycol), alkyl sulfonic acid, castor oil, guar gum, and/or triethanolamine dodecylbenzene sulfonate. The fire suppressant does not pose any risk to plant or animal life since the product is completely benign and is classified as non-toxic. It does not cause any damage to aquifers or groundwater, and it biodegrades in 30 to 60 days.