Biodegradable Microcapsules via Epoxide-Polyamine Shell

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The fragrance industry faces challenges with the rapid evaporation and dissipation of volatile fragrance compounds due to their high volatility, and existing microencapsulation methods often use non-biodegradable materials that are harmful to the environment and human health, lacking in oxidative stability and control over release properties.

Innovation Solution

Development of biodegradable core-shell microcapsules with a shell formed from a biobased epoxide, specifically diglycidyl ether diphenolic ester, and a polyamine, which provides stability and controlled release of fragrances without using isocyanates or melamine-formaldehyde systems, suitable for use in consumer products like laundry detergents and fabric conditioners.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If spray drying is used for microencapsulation, then manufacturing simplicity and low cost are achieved, but oxidative stability deteriorates due to high temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidoxidative stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temperature parameter during microencapsulation from high temperatures (spray drying) to low temperatures (freeze drying), thereby preserving oxidative stability while maintaining manufacturing feasibility. The low temperature parameter prevents thermal oxidation of fragrance compounds during the encapsulation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the thermal-mechanical spray drying process with a cryogenic freeze drying process. This substitution eliminates the harmful thermal effects while achieving microencapsulation, using freezing and sublimation mechanisms instead of heat-based atomization and drying.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Stability of the object's composition

If freeze drying is used for microencapsulation, then oxidative stability is improved, but release control deteriorates due to high porosity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidative stabilityVSAvoidrelease control
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite polymer shell structure comprising multiple polymer components with different properties. This composite structure allows optimization of both oxidative stability and release control by combining materials that provide barrier properties with those that enable controlled fragrance release, overcoming the limitations of single-material approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates local quality variations within the microcapsule shell by incorporating polymers with different permeability characteristics in specific regions or layers. This allows the shell to exhibit both high oxidative stability (through impermeable barrier layers) and controlled release properties (through selectively permeable regions), addressing the contradiction between stability and release control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If coacervation is used for microencapsulation, then encapsulation efficiency is improved, but wall strength deteriorates due to non-covalent interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencapsulation efficiencyVSAvoidwall strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary action by forming a strong polymeric shell structure before encapsulating the fragrance material. The polymer shell is pre-formed with covalent bonds providing structural strength, and then the fragrance is encapsulated within this robust framework, ensuring both high encapsulation efficiency and strong wall strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the bonding parameter from non-covalent interactions (coacervation) to covalent bonding (polymerization). By using polymerization reactions to form the shell, the invention achieves both high encapsulation efficiency and strong wall strength, as covalent bonds provide superior mechanical strength compared to weak non-covalent interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If interfacial polymerization is used for microencapsulation, then wall strength is improved, but environmental harm increases due to toxic reactants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewall strengthVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts harmful toxic reactants into beneficial non-toxic alternatives. Instead of using isocyanates and formaldehyde which are harmful to health and environment, the invention employs water and carbon dioxide as reactants to form the polymer shell. This converts a potentially harmful chemical process into an environmentally benign one, maintaining wall strength while eliminating toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces water as an intermediary substance that mediates the polymerization reaction to form the shell. Water acts as a safe alternative to toxic isocyanates, enabling the formation of strong polymeric walls through hydrolysis and condensation reactions without exposing workers or the environment to harmful chemicals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The biodegradable microcapsules offer improved stability and controlled release of fragrances, reducing environmental impact and human health risks while maintaining fragrance persistence and consumer acceptance.

Implementation Method 1

Interfacial polymerization typically involves reactions between oil-soluble and water-soluble components to form polymeric microcapsules

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterfacial polymerization: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

Ideally, the core material is protected from the surrounding environment (e.g., heat, oxygen, moisture, UV radiation, interaction with other materials)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical containment: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 3

the polymer films, formed exclusively by non-covalent ionic interactions and phase separation, result in low strength of microcapsule walls

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS20250000761A1Biodegradable microcapsules
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC
  • US20250000761A1 patent drawing
  • US20250000761A1 patent drawing
  • US20250000761A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to biodegradable core-shell microcapsule compositions wherein the microcapsule shell contains a polymer formed with a biobased epoxide and a polyamine. This disclosure also relates to a method of preparing such biodegradable core-shell microcapsules. This disclosure also relates to consumer products containing such biodegradable core-shell microcapsules.