Biofeedback Hernia Support With Adaptive Pressure Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing passive hernia prevention devices are ineffective due to their inability to respond to biofeedback, apply inconsistent and often inadequate pressure, and lack mechanisms for adjusting pressure based on user needs, particularly failing to address specific anatomical locations like the lumbar, large ventral, or Spigelian hernias.

Innovation Solution

A smart device incorporating biofeedback mechanisms, sensors, and a controller to detect respiratory and muscle activity, and apply synchronized or asynchronous pressure to counteract intra-abdominal forces, with adjustable pressure applicators and wireless communication for real-time data transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If passive mechanical pressure devices like abdominal belts are used, then they provide continuous pressure support, but they fail to respond to biofeedback and apply inconsistent pressure that is often inadequate for preventing hernia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehernia prevention effectivenessVSAvoidbiofeedback response capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system where sensors detect user-specific biofeedback signals (respiratory movement, muscle activity) and the controller adjusts pressure applicator output in real-time. This ensures the device responds dynamically to actual physiological conditions, resolving the contradiction between providing reliable hernia prevention and incorporating automated biofeedback response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The device monitors its own performance through integrated sensors and automatically adjusts pressure levels without external intervention. The system self-regulates by detecting respiratory cycles and muscle activation, thereby serving itself to maintain optimal pressure support while preventing hernia, eliminating the need for manual adjustment and ensuring consistent effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Duration of action of moving object

If passive devices apply constant pressure, then they provide continuous support, but the pressure is often ill-positioned and non-calibrated leading to zero positive outcome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous support durationVSAvoidpressure positioning and calibration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static constant pressure to dynamic adaptive pressure. The pressure applicators adjust their output in real-time based on detected respiratory phase and muscle activity, maintaining precise positioning and calibration throughout the duration of use. This dynamic adjustment ensures continuous support while preventing the pressure from becoming ill-positioned or non-calibrated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously varies pressure parameters (magnitude, timing, duration) based on physiological feedback. Pressure is applied synchronously with respiratory cycles and muscle activation patterns, changing parameters dynamically rather than maintaining fixed constant pressure. This ensures accurate positioning and calibration are maintained throughout the duration of action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If simple elastic or leather belts are used, then they are easy to manufacture and wear, but they apply hit or miss load that loses shape and structure over time reducing efficacy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice fabrication simplicityVSAvoiddevice shape and structure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the support device into discrete functional segments: sensors, controllers, and multiple independently controllable pressure applicators. This segmentation allows each component to maintain its specific function and structure, preventing the overall device from losing its shape and effectiveness over time while remaining manufacturable using standard electronic and mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces passive mechanical elastic belts with an active electromechanical system. Instead of relying on elastic material properties that degrade over time, the system uses electronically controlled pressure applicators that maintain precise force output. This substitution eliminates the shape loss and structure degradation inherent in elastic materials while keeping the device manufacturable through standard electronic assembly processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If passive devices are used, then they require no power source or control mechanism, but they provide almost always fail to prevent or stabilize the hernia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem component simplicityVSAvoidhernia stabilization effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback-controlled system where sensors detect physiological signals and the controller adjusts pressure applicator output accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable hernia stabilization by continuously adapting to actual physiological conditions, resolving the contradiction between device complexity and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The device autonomously monitors its own performance through integrated sensors and automatically adjusts pressure levels without external intervention. This self-service capability ensures reliable hernia prevention while maintaining manageable system complexity through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively mitigates hernia formation by applying targeted pressure in response to user-specific biofeedback, enhancing prevention and management of various hernia types, including lumbar, ventral, and Spigelian hernias, while providing real-time data for personalized care.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor mechanism configured to identify an amount or change in physical dimension and/or force exerted by a muscle during respiration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical activity detection:

Implementation Method 2

a pressure applicator located at one or more anatomical locations at risk of forming a hernia or aggravating a healing hernia to apply a focal load at the one or more locations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical pressure: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP3746012B1Devices for the management and prevention of hernia and other musculosketal injuries
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 VYAS DINESH
  • EP3746012B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3746012B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3746012B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for mitigating and/or preventing a hernia using a wearable device worn by a user such that an output device is positioned at a predetermined location corresponding to a target hernia mitigation site on the user's body. One or more physical parameters of the user are monitored to identify when the user is about to perform a predetermined physical activity, and the output device is activated to provide an output to mitigate a hernia or prevent a hernia from occurring at the mitigation site when the predetermined activity is performed.