Personalized Biologic Dosing via Pharmacokinetic Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases often fail to achieve optimal biologic drug concentrations, leading to ineffective treatment outcomes due to variability in patient pharmacokinetics and autoantibody production, resulting in increased healthcare costs and treatment inefficacy.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the analysis of biological samples to quantify biologic drug levels, autoantibodies, and albumin, followed by the adjustment of drug doses and inter-dose intervals based on likelihood calculations using algorithms like Naive Bayes or Metropolis Hastings, to achieve a pre-specified threshold concentration, potentially switching to alternative drugs like small molecule inhibitors if necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard dosing regimens are used for biologic drugs, then treatment coverage is broad and simple to administer, but treatment effectiveness is reduced due to variability in patient pharmacokinetics and autoantibody production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment regimen complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting drug dosage and dosing interval based on measured pharmacokinetic parameters (drug concentration, autoantibody levels, albumin levels) for each patient. This transforms the fixed standard dosing regimen into a dynamic, personalized dosing strategy that adapts to individual patient characteristics, thereby improving treatment effectiveness while managing complexity through systematic measurement and calculation protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by measuring drug concentrations, autoantibody levels, and albumin levels in patient samples, then using these measurements to determine subsequent dosing decisions. The system calculates the probability of achieving therapeutic concentrations and uses this feedback information to adjust future dosing, creating a closed-loop control system that continuously optimizes treatment based on actual patient response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If higher doses or more frequent dosing are administered to ensure therapeutic concentrations, then treatment effectiveness improves, but healthcare costs and treatment burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic concentration achievementVSAvoidhealthcare resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes to optimize dosing by calculating the probability of achieving therapeutic concentrations based on measured pharmacokinetic parameters. Instead of universally increasing doses, the system adjusts dosage and dosing interval specific to each patient's measured parameters, achieving therapeutic goals while minimizing unnecessary resource consumption in patients who already achieve adequate concentrations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by administering only the necessary dose to achieve therapeutic concentrations for each patient rather than using fixed high doses for all. The system determines the minimum effective dosing strategy based on individual patient pharmacokinetics, avoiding excessive medication use in patients who achieve therapeutic levels with standard or reduced dosing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If personalized dosing based on pharmacokinetic analysis is implemented, then treatment effectiveness and resource optimization improve, but measurement and calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment optimization efficiencyVSAvoidanalysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the personalized dosing process into distinct measurable components: drug concentration measurement, autoantibody level measurement, albumin level measurement, probability calculation, and dosing decision. This segmentation transforms a complex holistic problem into manageable discrete steps that can be systematically executed and monitored

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses intermediaries in the form of standardized measurement protocols and calculation algorithms that bridge the gap between raw patient data and dosing decisions. These intermediaries include defined assays for measuring pharmacokinetic parameters and established probability calculation methods, which simplify the translation from complex measurements to actionable dosing recommendations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240254243A1Systems and methods for improved targeted therapy
Publication Date: 2024.08.01 PROMETHEUS LABORATORIES INC
  • US20240254243A1 patent drawing
  • US20240254243A1 patent drawing
  • US20240254243A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are systems and methods for optimizing a biological therapy regimen for a subject. The subject may be a patient diagnosed with an immune mediated inflammatory disease. In some embodiments, the systems and methods may involve inputting patient data into a model to forecast a drug concentration level in a patient and establish a dosing regimen for maintaining a pre-specified threshold drug concentration level in the patient. The pre-specified threshold may be a target concentration level for effective treatment of the immune mediated inflammatory disease in the patient.