Biological Sample Analysis Matrix Pooling Strategy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for testing multiple biological samples require excessive time and cost due to the need for individual testing of each sample, especially when the incidence of a specific property is low, and existing pooling methods become impractical with increasing sample numbers.

Innovation Solution

A biological sample analysis system and method that pools samples into matrices and uses a determiner to assess the possibility of false positives, selecting a minimum number of additional samples for individual testing to confirm the presence of a specific property, thereby reducing the overall number of tests required.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If individual testing is performed on each biological sample, then testing accuracy is maintained, but testing time and cost increase significantly with the number of samples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The testing process is segmented into two stages: (1) pooled testing where multiple samples are tested together in groups, and (2) individual testing only for samples identified as potentially positive. This segmentation allows most negative samples to be identified through efficient pooled testing, while maintaining the ability to confirm positives through individual testing, thus reducing overall testing time while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Pooled testing is performed as a preliminary action before individual testing. By first testing groups of samples together, the system preliminarily identifies which samples may be positive, allowing subsequent individual testing to be focused only on those specific samples rather than all samples, thereby significantly reducing total testing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If pooled testing is performed to reduce testing cost, then testing efficiency improves, but false positive determination becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidfalse positive determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from pooled test results to guide subsequent individual testing decisions. When a pooled test shows a positive result, the system feeds back information about which specific samples in that pool need individual testing, allowing precise identification of true positives while filtering out false positives through the systematic evaluation of multiple pool combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the one-dimensional problem of individual sample testing into a two-dimensional matrix of pooled samples, where samples are organized in rows and columns. By analyzing test results across both dimensions (row pools and column pools), the system can precisely locate positive samples and distinguish true positives from false positives through the intersection pattern of positive results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If the number of samples to be tested at a time increases, then testing cost per sample decreases, but the amount of sample required for mixing increases exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of samples tested per testVSAvoidsample amount required
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of mixing all samples into a single large pool, the system segments samples into multiple smaller pools arranged in a matrix structure. This segmentation allows efficient testing of large numbers of samples (e.g., 16 samples in a 4x4 matrix) while each individual pool contains only a manageable number of samples, avoiding the exponential sample amount requirement of traditional single-pool methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a one-dimensional single-pool approach to a two-dimensional matrix structure with row pools and column pools. This dimensional change allows the testing of N×N samples using only 2N pools instead of requiring a single pool with all N×N samples, dramatically reducing the sample amount required per test while maintaining the ability to test large numbers of samples efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10002232B2Biological sample analysis system and method
Publication Date: 2018.06.19 SAMSUNG SDS CO LTD
  • US10002232B2 patent drawing
  • US10002232B2 patent drawing
  • US10002232B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a biological sample analysis system and method for determining whether or not each of a plurality of biological samples has a test-target property using the plurality of biological samples and a plurality of pools generated by pooling samples. The system includes a determiner configured to determine whether or not there is a possibility of a determination of a false positive according to test values for the test-target property of the plurality of pools, an additional sample selector configured to select a minimum number of additional test-target samples on which an individual test of whether or not a sample has the test-target property will be carried out from among the plurality of samples when it is determined that there is the possibility of a determination of a false positive, and a test result determiner configured to determine whether or not each of the plurality of samples has the test-target property according to test results of the additional test-target samples.