BioLPG Production with Zeolite Catalysts for Higher C3-C4 Yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processes for producing BioLPG (biological liquefied petroleum gas) suffer from low yields and lack commercial viability, with conventional methods primarily focusing on longer chain hydrocarbons or olefins, producing LPG as a secondary by-product in low yields.

Innovation Solution

A process using specific zeolite catalysts, such as ZSM5 and MCM22, converts aliphatic alcohols derived from renewable sources into BioLPG in high yield by optimizing reaction conditions, including temperature, pressure, and catalyst promotion with elements like boron and phosphorus, and rejuvenating catalysts with air exposure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional hydrotreatment processes are used to produce BioLPG from bio-oils, then Biodiesel production is achieved, but BioLPG yield is low (ratio of biodiesel to biopropane is typically around 9:1 to 10:1)

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveBioLPG yieldVSAvoidProcess efficiency for BioLPG production
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the reaction parameters by using different catalysts (zeolites such as ZSM-5, beta, Y, or mordenite) and adjusting reaction conditions (temperature of 200-400°C, pressure of 1-50 bar) to shift the product distribution from biodiesel-dominated to BioLPG-dominated, achieving BioLPG yields of 60-80%

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses ethanol as a model compound to replicate and study the conversion mechanisms of complex bio-oils, allowing optimization of reaction conditions for high BioLPG yield before applying to real bio-oil feedstocks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Quantity of substance

If processes are optimized for production of longer chain hydrocarbons or olefins, then those products are produced, but LPG is only formed as a secondary by-product in low yield

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLPG yieldVSAvoidProcess design for LPG production
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of producing LPG as a by-product of longer chain hydrocarbon synthesis, the patent inverts the approach by using ethanol dehydration to ethylene as the primary reaction, followed by oligomerization to directly produce C3-C4 hydrocarbons (LPG) as the main product

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the conversion process into distinct stages: ethanol dehydration to ethylene, ethylene oligomerization to C3-C4 hydrocarbons, and selective hydrogenation, with each stage optimized for maximum LPG production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If catalysts are used for BioLPG production, then conversion efficiency is improved, but catalyst lifetime is limited and selectivity diminishes with use

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveConversion efficiencyVSAvoidCatalyst lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a catalyst regeneration cycle where spent catalyst is periodically regenerated by burning off coke deposits in situ, restoring catalyst activity and selectivity without removing the catalyst from the reactor, thereby extending catalyst lifetime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The catalyst is designed to be self-regenerating through periodic oxidation treatments that remove deactivating coke deposits, allowing the catalyst to maintain its performance over extended periods without replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If BioLPG production is scaled up for commercial viability, then production volume increases, but economic feasibility is compromised due to low yields

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveProduction volumeVSAvoidEconomic feasibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes reaction parameters (temperature, pressure, catalyst composition, ethanol-to-water ratio) to achieve BioLPG yields of 60-80%, making the process economically viable by maximizing the value product from the feedstock

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses ethanol as a surrogate feedstock to develop and optimize the conversion process, allowing thorough parameter optimization and mechanism understanding before scaling to commercial bio-oil feedstocks, reducing technical and economic risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves high yields of BioLPG, extending catalyst lifetime, and maintains selectivity for C3 and C4 hydrocarbons, with the ability to rejuvenate catalysts, making it economically viable.

Implementation Method 1

certain zeolite catalysts, such as ZSM5 and MCM22, converts aliphatic alcohols derived from renewable sources into BioLPG in high yield

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

catalyst promotion with elements like boron and phosphorus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

rejuvenating catalysts with air exposure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentEP4259325B1Bio-LPG production process
Publication Date: 2026.04.22 CALOR SA
  • EP4259325B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4259325B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4259325B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The present invention is in the field of processes for the production of BioLPG, and catalysts for use in said processes.